Page title matches

  • =[[Homework_2_OldKiwi|HW2]] Peer Review, ECE 662, Spring 2008= ...Each homework is given a number. You may use anonymous login to leave your review about the homework. You may also upload your reviews in the form of a pdf f
    4 KB (581 words) - 12:15, 11 November 2010
  • = Software Bounty: PDF upload for Peer Review system/Double_Blind = ...goal of this [[Rhea Bounties|bounty]] is to add functionality to the Peer Review System. There is a need for PDF upload and the inclusion of Double Blindnes
    1 KB (212 words) - 10:22, 28 December 2010
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of [[Hw1_ECE662_S12|HW1]], [[ECE662]], Spring 2012= [[Category:peer review]]
    3 KB (583 words) - 13:40, 20 February 2012
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of [[Hw2_ECE662_S12|HW2]], [[ECE662]], Spring 2012= [[Category:peer review]]
    2 KB (375 words) - 12:31, 9 April 2012
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of HW1, [[ECE662]], Spring 2014= [[Category:peer review]]
    2 KB (364 words) - 13:38, 27 February 2014
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of HW2, [[ECE662]], Spring 2014= [[Category:peer review]]
    3 KB (512 words) - 03:30, 23 April 2014
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of Mini Project 1, [[ECE662]], Spring 2016= Hard copy of review due in class Friday February 26, 2016. Earlier submissions are welcome!
    3 KB (453 words) - 14:53, 19 February 2016
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of Mini Project 2, [[ECE662]], Spring 2016= Hard copy of review due in class Friday April 1, 2016. Earlier submissions are welcome!
    3 KB (462 words) - 12:33, 25 March 2016
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of Mini Project 3, [[ECE662]], Spring 2016= Hard copy of review due in class Friday April 29, 2016. Earlier submissions are welcome!
    3 KB (463 words) - 19:09, 31 March 2016

Page text matches

  • *'''Double-blind peer review system''': an add-on to the dropbox, which enables students to grade each o
    4 KB (536 words) - 07:40, 19 March 2013
  • * Double-blind peer review (description coming soon!) * A formal double-blind peer review system can be set up through Rhea. This is particularly useful in project-b
    6 KB (1,060 words) - 13:12, 6 May 2012
  • ...". One of their achievements that semester was the first version of a peer review system. Ananya took charge of the [[About liaisons|liaison program]] and di
    11 KB (1,568 words) - 18:46, 30 August 2012
  • *[[About_Peer_Review|Double-blind peer review system]]: enables students to grade each others homework or project reports *[[Peer legacy|Peer Legacy]]: students sharing reflections and advice about the classes they to
    6 KB (877 words) - 07:22, 21 March 2013
  • ...upload for Peer Review system/Double Blind]] Solved [[PDF upload for Peer Review system Awarded to Nathan Radebaugh|by Nathan Radebaugh]]
    3 KB (411 words) - 08:34, 3 November 2011
  • == Peer review of the homework== [[Peer review_Old Kiwi]]
    5 KB (746 words) - 16:33, 17 April 2008
  • =[[Homework_2_OldKiwi|HW2]] Peer Review, ECE 662, Spring 2008= ...Each homework is given a number. You may use anonymous login to leave your review about the homework. You may also upload your reviews in the form of a pdf f
    4 KB (581 words) - 12:15, 11 November 2010
  • ...ew of homework 2. Each student will be assigned another student's paper to review by e-mail. Double blind review: each review should be posted using an anonymous login.
    982 B (159 words) - 10:25, 5 May 2008
  • *There will not be a final project homework assignment, instead a peer review of the last homework will take place see [[Homework 3_Old Kiwi|Homework 3]]
    8 KB (1,244 words) - 08:44, 17 January 2013
  • ...of the second homework assignment. Click [https://balthier.ecn.purdue.edu/review//index.php/Main_Page here] to see the results.
    5 KB (832 words) - 10:36, 25 August 2008
  • ** double blind peer review of homework or course projects ==For peer networking and mentoring==
    3 KB (359 words) - 08:20, 14 September 2009
  • *Rhea potentially has both a peer student audience and a professional audience and as such is a sort of odd m ...re students that read/post for course purposes such as homework or lecture review. I would hope that professors utilize RHEA to determine if student posting
    9 KB (1,621 words) - 16:36, 1 January 2010
  • = [[Peer_legacy |Peer Legacy]] for [[ECE438]] = ...aren't the best at digesting mathematical steps "on the spot", be sure to review your notes after class, because if you understand completely the steps behi
    17 KB (3,004 words) - 08:11, 15 December 2011
  • = [[Peer legacy|Peer Legacy]] for ECE311 = ...avoid power-hour sessions (unless that is your preferred learning style). Review vector calculus problems and establish ''consistent'' notation for your hom
    6 KB (1,072 words) - 16:49, 10 December 2010
  • *[[MA35100Spring2010KumminiExam2Rev | Exam 2 Review]] * Peer Legacy: [[PeerLegacyMA351|read the advice of students who have taken this c
    3 KB (402 words) - 12:34, 4 May 2010
  • peer/pier review/revue
    6 KB (946 words) - 11:27, 22 January 2010
  • ...le to Normally distributed data. The next homework will consists in a peer review of this homework. :: In my Rhea dropbox, as the peer review system is not quite ready yet. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 09:48, 1 March 20
    4 KB (596 words) - 13:17, 12 November 2010
  • == Peer review of the homework== [[Peer review_OldKiwi]]
    5 KB (761 words) - 10:53, 13 April 2010
  • *HW4, due Wednesday September 22, 2010: complete the peer review of [[Hw3ECE438F10|HW3]].
    9 KB (1,221 words) - 11:00, 22 December 2014
  • ...as announced that the second homework would be graded by double-blind peer review. ...asing when sampling pure frequencies. It is highly suggested that students review the periodicity of discrete-time complex exponentials (including the concep
    2 KB (233 words) - 07:52, 7 September 2010
  • ...sforms of the signal you used in [[Hw2ECE38F10|HW2]] and in doing the peer review of [[Hw2ECE38F10|HW2]].
    2 KB (249 words) - 12:30, 8 September 2010
  • Your review is due by 6pm on Wednesday September 15, 2010. ...omework 2" dropbox, and will therefore be assigned a review by Rhea's peer review system.
    4 KB (567 words) - 12:09, 13 September 2010
  • ...an talking about sampling. It was announced that the deadline for the peer-review is now pushed back. (I will announce when later.)
    1 KB (188 words) - 07:19, 15 September 2010
  • Note that the peer review is due next Wednesday.
    756 B (100 words) - 11:55, 17 September 2010
  • Don't forget to complete the peer review before Wednesday 6pm!
    811 B (114 words) - 04:34, 27 October 2010
  • == Peer Legacy (student course review and advice)<br> == Share (and read) advice regarding VIP on [[Peer Legacy ECE495VIP|this page]].
    1 KB (129 words) - 12:16, 21 September 2011
  • == Peer Legacy == Share advice with future students regarding ECE600 on [[Peer Legacy ECE600|this page]].
    2 KB (238 words) - 12:14, 25 September 2013
  • = Software Bounty: PDF upload for Peer Review system/Double_Blind = ...goal of this [[Rhea Bounties|bounty]] is to add functionality to the Peer Review System. There is a need for PDF upload and the inclusion of Double Blindnes
    1 KB (212 words) - 10:22, 28 December 2010
  • **[[Peer Legacy ECE301|Peer Legacy for EE301]] *Suggested times for review session:<br> ===
    18 KB (2,485 words) - 10:36, 11 November 2011
  • ...icking the button titled "view Submission". Note that the dropbox and peer review software have been developed by Purdue students. If you do not like this so ...tructor/TA/grader will know who is writing/grading what thanks to the peer review system, which keeps track of the Purdue career logins of the authors/grader
    4 KB (633 words) - 12:31, 2 March 2011
  • ...working on [[HW6_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|HW6]] (a double-blind peer review of [[HW5_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|HW5]]).
    1,022 B (140 words) - 18:58, 4 March 2011
  • This homework consists of a double-blind peer-review of [[HW6_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|homework 5]]. In other words, you wi ...anonymous) waiting to be reviewed, along with a space to write/upload your review. Open the file and grade each question according to the instructions descri
    7 KB (1,161 words) - 18:50, 4 March 2011
  • ...icking the button titled "view Submission". Note that the dropbox and peer review software have been developed by Purdue students. If you do not like this so ...tructor/TA/grader will know who is writing/grading what thanks to the peer review system, which keeps track of the Purdue career login of the authors/graders
    4 KB (695 words) - 18:23, 7 March 2011
  • ...W7 will never expand. Is there a way to check I successfully submitted the review for HW8? ...pdate this peer review" button under HW7, it only showed the previous peer review (HW6), content under HW7 was missing. Anyone have any idea of what went wro
    2 KB (345 words) - 14:20, 22 March 2011
  • This homework consists of a double-blind peer-review of [[HW7_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|homework 7]]. In other words, you wi ...he instructor's Assignment Box before the deadline can participate in this review.
    6 KB (1,090 words) - 07:36, 22 March 2011
  • ...icking the button titled "view Submission". Note that the dropbox and peer review software have been developed by Purdue students. If you do not like this so ...tructor/TA/grader will know who is writing/grading what thanks to the peer review system, which keeps track of the Purdue career login of the authors/graders
    5 KB (797 words) - 09:19, 7 April 2011
  • This homework consists of a double-blind peer-review of [[HW10_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|homework 10]]. In other words, you ...he instructor's Assignment Box before the deadline can participate in this review.
    3 KB (472 words) - 03:54, 18 April 2011
  • ...it when it had a different number: just write that number as part of your review/comment/advice. *Write a comment for the peer legacy of at least one other course [[Peer_legacy|here]].
    10 KB (1,359 words) - 03:50, 31 August 2013
  • ...it when it had a different number: just write that number as part of your review/comment/advice. *Write a comment for the peer legacy of at least one other course [[Peer_legacy|here]].
    1 KB (181 words) - 06:34, 11 September 2013
  • ...it when it had a different number: just write that number as part of your review/comment/advice. *Write a comment for the peer legacy of at least one other course [[Peer_legacy|here]].
    1 KB (159 words) - 06:34, 11 September 2013
  • ...it when it had a different number: just write that number as part of your review/comment/advice. *Write a comment for the peer legacy of at least one other course [[Peer_legacy|here]].
    1 KB (161 words) - 06:34, 11 September 2013
  • == Peer Legacy == Share advice with future students regarding ECE538 on [[Peer Legacy ECE538|this page]].
    1 KB (152 words) - 12:17, 24 February 2015
  • ...|"ECE662 Peer Legacy" page]]. You can read the [[Peer_Legacy_ECE301|ECE301 peer legacy page]] to see some examples. *[[HW1_peer_review_ECE662S12|Peer review of homework 1]], due Thursday February 23, 11:59pm.
    4 KB (514 words) - 07:20, 25 June 2012
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of [[Hw1_ECE662_S12|HW1]], [[ECE662]], Spring 2012= [[Category:peer review]]
    3 KB (583 words) - 13:40, 20 February 2012
  • *There will not be a final project homework assignment, instead a peer review of the last homework will take place see [[Homework 3_OldKiwi]] for details
    8 KB (1,214 words) - 11:24, 10 June 2013
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of [[Hw2_ECE662_S12|HW2]], [[ECE662]], Spring 2012= [[Category:peer review]]
    2 KB (375 words) - 12:31, 9 April 2012
  • The last [[HW2_peer_review_ECE662S12|peer review]] and the [[Hw3_ECE662_S12|last homework assignment]] were announced.
    1 KB (166 words) - 04:02, 12 April 2012
  • == Peer Reviews == *[[Instructions peer review hw1|Instruction for peer reviewing HW1]]
    10 KB (1,450 words) - 20:50, 2 May 2016
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of HW1, [[ECE662]], Spring 2014= [[Category:peer review]]
    2 KB (364 words) - 13:38, 27 February 2014
  • =Instruction for Peer Review of HW2, [[ECE662]], Spring 2014= [[Category:peer review]]
    3 KB (512 words) - 03:30, 23 April 2014

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang