Revision as of 19:57, 9 October 2014 by Yyeshmuk (Talk | contribs)


Downsampling

A slecture by ECE student Yerkebulan Yeshmukhanbetov

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.


Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Definition of Downsampling
  3. Derivation of DTFT of downsampled signal
  4. Example
  5. Conclusion
  6. References

Introduction

This slecture provides definition of downsampling, derives DTFT  downsampled signal and demonstrates it in a frequency domain. Also, it explains process of decimation and why it needs a low-pass filter.


Definition of Downsampling

Downsampling is an operation which involves throwing away samples from discrete-time signal. Let  x[n] be a digital-time signal shown below:

GRAPH

 then y[n] will be produced by downsampling x [n]  by factor D = 3. So, y [n] = x[Dn].

GRAPH

As seen in above graph, y [n] is obtained by throwing away some samples from x [n]. So, y [n] is a downsampled signal from

x [n].


Derivation of DTFT of downsampled signal

Let x (t) be a continuous time signal. Then x1 [n] = x (T1n) and  x2 [n] = x (T2n). And ratio of sampling periods would be

D = T2/T1,   which is an integer greater than 1. From these equations we obtain realtionship between x1 [n] and x2 [n].

$ \begin{align} x_2 [n] = x(T_2 n) = x(DT_1 n) = x_1 [nD] \end{align} $

Below we derive Discrete-Time Fourier Transform of x2 [n] in terms of DTFT of x1 [n].


$ \begin{align} &\mathcal{X}_2(\omega)= \mathcal{F}(x_2 [n]) = \mathcal{F}(x_1 [Dn])\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x_1[Dn] e^{-j \omega n} = \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty x_1[m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty s_D[m]* x_1 [m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ \end{align} $


where

$ s_D [m]=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1,& \text{ if } n \text{ is a multiple of } 4,\\ 0, & \text{ else}. \end{array}\right. = {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}} $


$ \begin{align} &\mathcal{X}_2(\omega)= \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}} x_1[m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ &= {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty x_1[m] e^{-jm ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}})} = \\ &= {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \mathcal{X}_1 ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}}) \\ \end{align} $


Example


Let's take a look  at  an original signal X1 (w) and  X2 (w) which is obtained after downsampling X1(w) by factor D = 2 in a frequency domain.

Downsamplegraph.jpg




We would like to determine what Xs(f) looks like in order to find a way to reconstruct x(t).

Since we have sampled at a rate fs > 2fM, the following inequalities hold:

$ f_s > 2f_M \iff f_s - f_M > f_M \iff -f_s + f_M < f_M $.

Together, these inequalities, the graph of X(f), and the expression for Xs(f) in terms of X(f) imply that Xs(f) will have the spectrum shown in the figure below.

Xs1.png

Notice that the spectrum of the ideal sampling of a signal is an amplitude scaled periodic repetition of the original spectrum. Since x(t) is bandlimited and we have sampled at a rate fs > 2fM, the periodic repetitions of X(f) do not overlap.

All the information needed to reconstruct X(f) can be found in the portion of Xs(f) that corresponds to X(f) (shown in red). Therefore we can use a simple lowpass filter with gain $ \tfrac{1}{f_s} $ and cutoff frequency $ \tfrac{f_s}{2} $ to recover X(f) from Xs(f).


$ X(f) = X_s(f)\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{1}{f_s}, & |f| \le \frac{f_s}{2}\\ 0, & \text{else} \end{array} \right. $

$ \iff x(t) = x_s(t)*\text{sinc}(f_st) $

$ \therefore $ We can perfectly reconstruct x(t) from xs(t).


Example

Though the Nyquist theorem states that perfect reconstruction is possible if we satisfy the Nyquist condition (fs > 2fM), it is important to note that this condition is not necessary. The following example demonstrates how perfect reconstruction is sometimes possible even when undersampling.

Let the signal x(t) have a spectrum X(f) as seen in the figure below.

X2.png

The Nyquist condition states that we should sample at a rate fs > 2(2a) = 4a. Instead, let us sample at fs = 2a.

As before, we have $ x_s(t) = x(t)p_{\frac{1}{f_s}}(t) $ and $ X_s(f) = f_s\sum_{k = -\infty}^\infty X(f-kf_s) $

$ \implies X_s(f) = 2a\sum_{k = -\infty}^\infty X(f-2ka) $.

Therefore, Xs(f) will have the spectrum shown in the figure below.

Xs2.png

Notice that there is no aliasing in Xs(f) even though fs < 4a. In addition, the portion of Xs(f) that corresponds to X(f) (shown in red) can be recovered using a bandpass filter with gain $ \tfrac{1}{2a} $ and cutoff frequencies a and 2a.


Conclusion

To summarize, the Nyquist theorem states that any bandlimited signal can be perfectly reconstructed from its sampling if sampled at a rate greater than twice its bandwidth (fs > 2fM). However, the Nyquist condition is not necessary for perfect reconstruction as shown in the example above.


References

[1] John G. Proakis, Dimitris G. Manolakis, "Digital Signal Processing with Principles, Algorithms, and Applications" 4th Edition,2006




Questions and comments

If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page.


Back to ECE438, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn