(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_CT_S13_mhossain|CT]]
 
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_CT_S13_mhossain|CT]]
 
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_PET_S13_mhossain|PET]]
 
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_PET_S13_mhossain|PET]]
 +
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_coordinate_rotation_S13_mhossain|Co-ordinate Rotation]]
 +
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_radon_transform_S13_mhossain|Radon Transform]]
 +
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_fourier_slice_theorem_S13_mhossain|Fourier Slice Theorem]]
 +
::↳ [[ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_convolution_back_projection_S13_mhossain|Convolution Back Projection]]
 +
 
----
 
----
  
Line 16: Line 21:
 
</font size>
 
</font size>
  
A sLecture by [[user:Mhossain | Maliha Hossain]]  
+
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php Slecture] by [[user:Mhossain | Maliha Hossain]]
  
 
<font size= 3> Subtopic 3: Positron Emission Tomography </font size>
 
<font size= 3> Subtopic 3: Positron Emission Tomography </font size>
Line 29: Line 34:
 
= Excerpt from Prof. Bouman's Lecture =
 
= Excerpt from Prof. Bouman's Lecture =
  
 +
:<youtube>qxM4EL8EPVs</youtube>
  
  
Line 37: Line 43:
 
Positron Emission Tomography, or PET, is a non invasive imaging technique that produces a three-dimensional representation of the body. It is commonly used in clinical oncology and is a functional medical imaging modality. It can also be used as a form of molecular imaging.  
 
Positron Emission Tomography, or PET, is a non invasive imaging technique that produces a three-dimensional representation of the body. It is commonly used in clinical oncology and is a functional medical imaging modality. It can also be used as a form of molecular imaging.  
  
Figure 1 shows a PET scanner. It is very similar to a CT scanner in appearance but the process in which measurements are taken by a PET scanner is completely different.  
+
Figure 1 shows a PET scanner. It is very similar to a CT scanner in appearance but the underlying physics of the acquisition is quite different.
  
 
[[Image:PET_fig1.jpeg|400px|thumb|left|Fig 1: A PET scanner equipped with CT system]]
 
[[Image:PET_fig1.jpeg|400px|thumb|left|Fig 1: A PET scanner equipped with CT system]]
  
Description of how PET works.
 
  
they inject you with a radiotracer. a radioactive tracer tupically FDG (fluorine deoxy glucose). a sugar with a fluorine atom attached. but this fuorine is F-18, a radioactive isotope of Fl. half life of about ...
+
Prior to a PET a scan, the patient is injected with a positron emitting radio-tracer, typically Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). FDG is a glucose molecule where the fluorine atom is the radioactive isotope <math>^{18}</math>F sugar with a fluorine atom attached. <math>^{18}</math>F has a half-life of about 110 minutes. This is long enough for it to be produced in a cyclotron, combined with the sugar and transported to the hospital and still be detectable after the sugar has been injected. Since an atom's chemical behavior is largely determined by its electronic structure, different isotopes exhibit nearly identical chemical behavior. The body therefore metabolizes FDG like other as sugars. Cancerous cells metabolize more sugar at a higher rate because they tend to grow uncontrollably. A tumor will have a higher rate of uptake of the FDG than the surrounding healthy tissue and it will light up in the scan. The bladder and kidneys will also light up since they regulate and excrete sugars.
this is long enough for it to be produced in a cyclotron and combined with the sugar and transported to the hospital and be detectable after the sugar has been injected (is the chemistry of a nuclear isotope the same?) the body metabolzes this as sugar. Cancerous cells tend to metabolize more sugar because they tend to grow at a fast rate. the tumour will have a higher rate of uptake of the FDG than the surrounding sugar and it will light up in the scan. your bladder and your kidneys will also light up since they process sugar to excrete it?
+
  
 +
[[Image:PET_fig2.gif|400px|thumb|left|Fig 2: A full-body PET]]
  
"The system detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer), which is introduced into the body on a biologically active molecule. "
 
FDG and fluorine isotope
 
* Subject is injected with radioactive tracer
 
* metabolism of sugar. chemistry
 
* Gamma rays travel in opposite directions
 
* When two detectors detect a photon simultaneously, we know that an event has occurred along the line connecting detectors.
 
* A ring of detectors can be used to measure all angles and displacements
 
  
obtain line integral/projection for CBP
+
As the FDG in patients body is metabolized, the radioactive isotope may break down. As it decays, it produces a positron which annihilates a nearby electron. As a result of this annihilation, two gamma particles are released. As the positron and the electron had non zero momentum before the collision, the momentum of the two gamma particles are also non zero. The paths they traverse make an angle of about 179 degrees. So to summarize, as a result of the annihilation you have two gamma particles travelling at almost exactly opposite directions. The PET contains a ring of detectors (this ring is stationary whereas the detectors in a CT scanner rotate with the gantry). Each detector in a PET scanner counts photons. When it encounters photon, it registers the time of the scintillation. A photon travels about a foot (30 cm) in free space in a nano second. When two detectors detect a photon simultaneously or within a small window of time, we know that an event has occurred along the line connecting detectors. A ring of detectors can be used to measure all angles and displacements
  
 +
So for example, let <math>t_i</math> and <math>t_j</math> be the time when detectors i and j in figure 3 register a scintillation. Since the cavity in the scanner is a few feet across, then we can assume that if <math>|t_i-t_j| < 10</math> ns, the gamma particles detected resulted from the same annihilation. They are from the same coincident event.
  
[[Image:PET_fig2.gif|400px|thumb|left|Fig 2: A full-body PET]]
+
Given that you have 512 detectors, you have 512(511)/2 virtual detectors. For every unique pair of detectors, you have a virtual detector and you could count how many annihilations occur along that detector and you get a line integral. So this is another technology where you the measurements are line integrals. Once you have obtained the projections, it boils down to the same inversion process as CT.  
 
+
the FDG in the patients body is metabolized, the FDG may break down but the F (ion?) is still radioactive. so the nuclues is unstable. when it breaks down, simplified, it releases a positron which annihilates a nearby electron. As a result of this annihilation, two gamma particles are released. the momentum of the two gamma particles are not exatly zero because the positron had some momentum before it collided with the electron. the angle is approximately 179 degrees. so you have two gamma particles travelling at almost exactly opposite directions. the PET contains a ring of detectors (this ring is stationary whereas the detectors in a CT scanner rotate with the gantry). Each detector in a PET scanner counts photons. when it encounters photon. it registers the time of the photon. a photon travels about a foot (30 cm to be exact) in free space in a ns. if two detectors that are across from each other detect a scintillation within at the same time or very close to each other (within a small margin of time) it is assumed that those two photons were produced from the same annihilation.
+
  
figure for positron electron annihilation
+
[[Image:PET_fig3.jpeg|400px|thumb|left|Fig 3: Event detection in a PET scanner]]
  
 
[[Image:PET_fig3.jpeg|400px|thumb|left|Fig 3: ]]
 
  
 
<math>E[y_i] = \sum_j A_{ij}x_j \ </math>
 
<math>E[y_i] = \sum_j A_{ij}x_j \ </math>
  
PET scanners are much more expensive than CT scanners. They also have poor spatial and temporal resolution. Most PET systems are equipped with a CT scanner like the one shown in figure 1. Figure 4 shows a PET scan superimposed on a CT scan. This is much more helpful to radiologists trying to diagnose diseases. You can see that there is very little anatomical detail in the stand alone PET scans in figures 2 and 4.
+
PET scanners are much more expensive than CT scanners. They also have relatively poor spatial and temporal resolution. Most PET systems are equipped with a CT scanner like the one shown in figure 1. Figure 4 shows a PET scan superimposed on a CT scan. This is much more helpful to radiologists in trying to diagnose diseases. You can see that there is very little anatomical detail in the stand alone PET scans in figures 2 and 4.
  
 
[[Image:PET_fig4.jpeg|600px|thumb|left|Fig 4: CT and PET scans (grey-scale) displayed on their own as well as superimposed on one another (images in blue)]]
 
[[Image:PET_fig4.jpeg|600px|thumb|left|Fig 4: CT and PET scans (grey-scale) displayed on their own as well as superimposed on one another (images in blue)]]
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
 +
* C. A. Bouman. ECE 637. Class Lecture. Digital Image Processing I. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University. Spring 2013.
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
==[[Talk:ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_PET_S13_mhossain|Questions and comments]]==
 +
 +
If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on [[Talk:ECE637_tomographic_reconstruction_PET_S13_mhossain|this page]]
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
[[ECE637_Bouman_lectures_Image_Processing_sLecture_mhossain|Back to the "Bouman Lectures on Image Processing" by Maliha Hossain]]

Latest revision as of 07:24, 26 February 2014

sLecture

Topic 2: Tomographic Reconstruction
Intro
CT
PET
Co-ordinate Rotation
Radon Transform
Fourier Slice Theorem
Convolution Back Projection


The Bouman Lectures on Image Processing

A Slecture by Maliha Hossain

Subtopic 3: Positron Emission Tomography

© 2013




Excerpt from Prof. Bouman's Lecture



Accompanying Lecture Notes

Positron Emission Tomography, or PET, is a non invasive imaging technique that produces a three-dimensional representation of the body. It is commonly used in clinical oncology and is a functional medical imaging modality. It can also be used as a form of molecular imaging.

Figure 1 shows a PET scanner. It is very similar to a CT scanner in appearance but the underlying physics of the acquisition is quite different.

Fig 1: A PET scanner equipped with CT system


Prior to a PET a scan, the patient is injected with a positron emitting radio-tracer, typically Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). FDG is a glucose molecule where the fluorine atom is the radioactive isotope $ ^{18} $F sugar with a fluorine atom attached. $ ^{18} $F has a half-life of about 110 minutes. This is long enough for it to be produced in a cyclotron, combined with the sugar and transported to the hospital and still be detectable after the sugar has been injected. Since an atom's chemical behavior is largely determined by its electronic structure, different isotopes exhibit nearly identical chemical behavior. The body therefore metabolizes FDG like other as sugars. Cancerous cells metabolize more sugar at a higher rate because they tend to grow uncontrollably. A tumor will have a higher rate of uptake of the FDG than the surrounding healthy tissue and it will light up in the scan. The bladder and kidneys will also light up since they regulate and excrete sugars.

Fig 2: A full-body PET


As the FDG in patients body is metabolized, the radioactive isotope may break down. As it decays, it produces a positron which annihilates a nearby electron. As a result of this annihilation, two gamma particles are released. As the positron and the electron had non zero momentum before the collision, the momentum of the two gamma particles are also non zero. The paths they traverse make an angle of about 179 degrees. So to summarize, as a result of the annihilation you have two gamma particles travelling at almost exactly opposite directions. The PET contains a ring of detectors (this ring is stationary whereas the detectors in a CT scanner rotate with the gantry). Each detector in a PET scanner counts photons. When it encounters photon, it registers the time of the scintillation. A photon travels about a foot (30 cm) in free space in a nano second. When two detectors detect a photon simultaneously or within a small window of time, we know that an event has occurred along the line connecting detectors. A ring of detectors can be used to measure all angles and displacements

So for example, let $ t_i $ and $ t_j $ be the time when detectors i and j in figure 3 register a scintillation. Since the cavity in the scanner is a few feet across, then we can assume that if $ |t_i-t_j| < 10 $ ns, the gamma particles detected resulted from the same annihilation. They are from the same coincident event.

Given that you have 512 detectors, you have 512(511)/2 virtual detectors. For every unique pair of detectors, you have a virtual detector and you could count how many annihilations occur along that detector and you get a line integral. So this is another technology where you the measurements are line integrals. Once you have obtained the projections, it boils down to the same inversion process as CT.

Fig 3: Event detection in a PET scanner


$ E[y_i] = \sum_j A_{ij}x_j \ $

PET scanners are much more expensive than CT scanners. They also have relatively poor spatial and temporal resolution. Most PET systems are equipped with a CT scanner like the one shown in figure 1. Figure 4 shows a PET scan superimposed on a CT scan. This is much more helpful to radiologists in trying to diagnose diseases. You can see that there is very little anatomical detail in the stand alone PET scans in figures 2 and 4.

Fig 4: CT and PET scans (grey-scale) displayed on their own as well as superimposed on one another (images in blue)



References

  • C. A. Bouman. ECE 637. Class Lecture. Digital Image Processing I. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University. Spring 2013.



Questions and comments

If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page



Back to the "Bouman Lectures on Image Processing" by Maliha Hossain

Alumni Liaison

BSEE 2004, current Ph.D. student researching signal and image processing.

Landis Huffman