(Support removal.) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm in favor of removing "discussion" pages as a separate concept. I like a simple interface with a few easy to figure out functions. Discussion pages, as far as I know, are simply wiki pages anyway. | I'm in favor of removing "discussion" pages as a separate concept. I like a simple interface with a few easy to figure out functions. Discussion pages, as far as I know, are simply wiki pages anyway. | ||
--[[User:Masonz|Masonz]] 13:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Masonz|Masonz]] 13:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :Ok, but then we would probably have to remove the "page" link under the page menu as well. I guess this might be a good thing anyway, since this is a slightly confusing link. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 14:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC) | |
+ | ::I'm in favor of removing "discussion" pages, since I have never seen them used in the Wiki. In Wikipedia, they allow discussion about "big" changes to a page to occur without modifying the page, but that functionality may not be useful in a class context. Part of the confusion may be that there should be both "Discussion" and "Edit Discussion" pages, but right now there is only one link, "Discussion," which acts as "Edit Discussion." --[[User:Yoder2|Yoder2]] 18:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:13, 10 September 2009
I'm in favor of removing "discussion" pages as a separate concept. I like a simple interface with a few easy to figure out functions. Discussion pages, as far as I know, are simply wiki pages anyway. --Masonz 13:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, but then we would probably have to remove the "page" link under the page menu as well. I guess this might be a good thing anyway, since this is a slightly confusing link. --Mboutin 14:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm in favor of removing "discussion" pages, since I have never seen them used in the Wiki. In Wikipedia, they allow discussion about "big" changes to a page to occur without modifying the page, but that functionality may not be useful in a class context. Part of the confusion may be that there should be both "Discussion" and "Edit Discussion" pages, but right now there is only one link, "Discussion," which acts as "Edit Discussion." --Yoder2 18:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)