| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by | + | * Review by Jacob Holtman |
| + | The initial outline and the numbering system makes the process easy to see. In the comb example the graph is easy to understand. The function <math> P_T </math> does not get explained until 1.1.4 while it is used in 1.1.3. It would be good to explain what that function means | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 07:35, 13 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Miguel Castellanos
I like how you introduce both operators with a graphical representation and then proceed to give a mathematical description. This organization seems natural to me. I also like how you explain the use of each operator. In your introduction to the rep operator, I believe it should be $ k \in \mathbb{Z} $ since you want to allow $ k $ to be negative as well. Also, you could clean up your multiplications by removing the periods (multiplication is implied by convention). Great slecture!
- Author answer here
- Review by Jacob Holtman
The initial outline and the numbering system makes the process easy to see. In the comb example the graph is easy to understand. The function $ P_T $ does not get explained until 1.1.4 while it is used in 1.1.3. It would be good to explain what that function means
- Author answer here
- Review by student 3
- Author answer here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
