Revision as of 17:20, 4 November 2010 by Mboutin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

HW8 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010

Question 2.

There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating.

Suggestions?

This is an excellent question, which makes me realize that I forgot to say the following in class: "Although the FFT makes the computation of a DFT faster on a computer, it does not make it faster for the DFT that we ask you to compute by hand. The idea is that, for N large, the number of operations needed to compute an FFT is much lower than that for computing a DFT using the formula. However, when we ask you to compute a DFT by hand, N is typically very small, so using the FFT usually only makes things more complicated. For answering Question 2, just use the definition of DFT (the summation formula) to compute it. --Mboutin 21:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Back to HW8 Back to ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett