Line 9: Line 9:
 
::If the words of the question sound unfamiliar to you, you absolutely have to read Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of Oppenheim-Willsky (the [[ECE301]] textbook). --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 
::If the words of the question sound unfamiliar to you, you absolutely have to read Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of Oppenheim-Willsky (the [[ECE301]] textbook). --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 
----
 
----
 +
 +
For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)?
 +
 +
 
[[Hw5ECE438F10|Back to HW5]]
 
[[Hw5ECE438F10|Back to HW5]]

Revision as of 17:29, 28 September 2010

HW5 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin

Use this page to discuss the homework. Feel free to post your answers and discuss them here. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


Any hints on how to start off 1b?

Look at the reconstruction in the Fourier domain. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand what 2a) wants. Reconstruction signal?> Is that ... inverse sampling it? ~ajfunche

If the words of the question sound unfamiliar to you, you absolutely have to read Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of Oppenheim-Willsky (the ECE301 textbook). --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)?


Back to HW5

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva