(New page: Category:pattern recognitionBochumSummer2014Boutin Category:homework =Homework 2, [[2014_Summer_pattern_recognition_Bochum_Boutin|Statistical Pattern Recognition, Summer 2014 (Boc...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
=Homework 2, [[2014_Summer_pattern_recognition_Bochum_Boutin|Statistical Pattern Recognition, Summer 2014 (Bochum)]]=
 
=Homework 2, [[2014_Summer_pattern_recognition_Bochum_Boutin|Statistical Pattern Recognition, Summer 2014 (Bochum)]]=
 +
 +
a) Suppose that two classes have the following densities:
 +
 +
<math>\rho(x|\omega_1) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}},</math>
 +
 +
<math>\rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-10)^2}{2}},</math>
 +
 +
and that the two classes have equal priors:
 +
 +
<math>Prob(\omega_1)=Prob(\omega_2)=0.5.  \ </math>
 +
 +
For <math>N=5,10,15,\ldots, 1000</math>, generate N points from the mixture density
 +
 +
<math>\rho(x) = 0.5 \rho(x|\omega_1)+0.5 \rho(x|\omega_2), \ </math>
 +
 +
keeping track of the true class each point was drawn from (the ground truth-- the label of each data point). Then use Baye's decision rule (assuming perfect knowledge of the parameters of the class density) to classify the points and record the (empirical) percentage of error.  Repeat this experience 100 times for each N, and plot your results (percentage of error versus N) on a graph. Also plot the average of the error, over all 100 trials, for each N. Plot  the standard derivation of the error, over all 100 trials, for each N, as well. How do the errors you obtained compare with Bayes' error? Discuss your results.
 +
 +
b) Repeat a) using the following class 2 density instead
 +
 +
<math>\rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-1)^2}{2}},</math>.
 +
 +
Discuss your results.
 +
 +
c) Repeat a) using the following class 2 density instead
 +
 +
<math>\rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-10)^2}{20}},</math>.
 +
 +
Discuss your results.
  
  

Latest revision as of 03:16, 8 July 2014


Homework 2, Statistical Pattern Recognition, Summer 2014 (Bochum)

a) Suppose that two classes have the following densities:

$ \rho(x|\omega_1) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}, $

$ \rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-10)^2}{2}}, $

and that the two classes have equal priors:

$ Prob(\omega_1)=Prob(\omega_2)=0.5. \ $

For $ N=5,10,15,\ldots, 1000 $, generate N points from the mixture density

$ \rho(x) = 0.5 \rho(x|\omega_1)+0.5 \rho(x|\omega_2), \ $

keeping track of the true class each point was drawn from (the ground truth-- the label of each data point). Then use Baye's decision rule (assuming perfect knowledge of the parameters of the class density) to classify the points and record the (empirical) percentage of error. Repeat this experience 100 times for each N, and plot your results (percentage of error versus N) on a graph. Also plot the average of the error, over all 100 trials, for each N. Plot the standard derivation of the error, over all 100 trials, for each N, as well. How do the errors you obtained compare with Bayes' error? Discuss your results.

b) Repeat a) using the following class 2 density instead

$ \rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-1)^2}{2}}, $.

Discuss your results.

c) Repeat a) using the following class 2 density instead

$ \rho(x|\omega_2) = \frac{1}{2\pi} e^{-\frac{(x-10)^2}{20}}, $.

Discuss your results.



Back to Statistical Pattern Recognition (Bochum) 2014

Alumni Liaison

To all math majors: "Mathematics is a wonderfully rich subject."

Dr. Paul Garrett