| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
| − | + | <center><font size="4"> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | <center><font size= 4> | + | |
Questions and Comments for | Questions and Comments for | ||
| + | </font> | ||
| + | <font size="4">Frequency domain view of the relationship between a signal and a sampling of that signal </font> | ||
| − | + | A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Botao Chen | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Partly based on the [[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture]] material of [[User:Mboutin|Prof. Mireille Boutin]]. | |
| + | </center> | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below. | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by Miguel Castellanos | + | |
| − | You have a great organization of your derivations and examples. Your first derivation helps ease the transition between continuous sampled signals and discrete sampled signals. The figures are good graphical represenations of the expressions you derive. A small source of confusion is that your final figure plots a function in terms of < | + | *Review by Miguel Castellanos |
| + | |||
| + | You have a great organization of your derivations and examples. Your first derivation helps ease the transition between continuous sampled signals and discrete sampled signals. The figures are good graphical represenations of the expressions you derive. A small source of confusion is that your final figure plots a function in terms of <span class="texhtml">ω</span> but your x-axis is in terms of <span class="texhtml">''f''</span>. Great job, overall! | ||
| + | |||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by | + | |
| + | *Review by Yerkebulan Y. | ||
| + | *You gave very good explanation of difference between FT of original signal x(t), sampled signal x<sub>s</sub>(t) and discrete signal x<sub>d</sub>[n]. Graphs in frequency domain help to understand this difference. You did a really good job ! <br> | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by student 3 | + | |
| + | *Review by student 3 | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by student 4 | + | |
| + | *Review by student 4 | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | [[ | + | |
| + | [[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:Review]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]] | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Frequency domain view of the relationship between a signal and a sampling of that signalA slecture by ECE student Botao Chen
Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Miguel Castellanos
You have a great organization of your derivations and examples. Your first derivation helps ease the transition between continuous sampled signals and discrete sampled signals. The figures are good graphical represenations of the expressions you derive. A small source of confusion is that your final figure plots a function in terms of ω but your x-axis is in terms of f. Great job, overall!
- Author answer here
- Review by Yerkebulan Y.
- You gave very good explanation of difference between FT of original signal x(t), sampled signal xs(t) and discrete signal xd[n]. Graphs in frequency domain help to understand this difference. You did a really good job !
- Author answer here
- Review by student 3
- Author answer here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
