Line 22: Line 22:
 
now we let <math>\omega</math> = 2<math>\pi</math><math>f</math>
 
now we let <math>\omega</math> = 2<math>\pi</math><math>f</math>
  
<math>X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt </math> making X(<math>2\pi f</math> = X(<math>f</math>
+
<math>X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt </math> \qquad \qquad making X(<math>2\pi f</math> = X(<math>f</math>
  
  

Revision as of 11:41, 18 September 2014


Fourier Transform as a Function of Frequency w Versus Frequency f (in Hertz)

A slecture by ECE student Randall Cochran

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.



To show the relationship between the Fourier Transform of frequency $ \omega $ versus frequency $ f $ (in hertz) we start with the definitions: $ X(w)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-jwt} dt \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad X(f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $


now we let $ \omega $ = 2$ \pi $$ f $

$ X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $ \qquad \qquad making X($ 2\pi f $ = X($ f $





(create a question page and put a link below)

Questions and comments

If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page.


Back to ECE438, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

EISL lab graduate

Mu Qiao