Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | To show the relationship between the Fourier Transform of frequency <math>\omega</math> versus frequency <math>f</math> (in hertz) we start with | + | To show the relationship between the Fourier Transform of frequency <math>\omega</math> versus frequency <math>f</math> (in hertz) we start with the definitions: |
− | <math>X(w)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-jwt} dt \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad X(f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt | + | <math>X(w)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-jwt} dt \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad X(f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt </math> |
− | </math> | + | now we let <math>omega</math> = 2\pi f |
---- | ---- | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 11:20, 18 September 2014
Fourier Transform as a Function of Frequency w Versus Frequency f (in Hertz)
A slecture by ECE student Randall Cochran
Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.
To show the relationship between the Fourier Transform of frequency $ \omega $ versus frequency $ f $ (in hertz) we start with the definitions: $ X(w)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-jwt} dt \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad X(f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $
now we let $ omega $ = 2\pi f
(create a question page and put a link below)
Questions and comments
If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page.