Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:problem solving]]
 +
[[Category:MA453]]
 +
[[Category:math]]
 +
[[Category:algebra]]
 +
 +
 +
=[[HW7_MA453Fall2008walther|HW7]] (Chapter 13, Problem 10) [[MA453]], Fall 2008, [[user:walther|Prof. Walther]]=
 +
----
 +
 
I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation".  Is that what they want?
 
I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation".  Is that what they want?
  
Line 17: Line 26:
 
----
 
----
 
Interesting.  I did the same thing, but quit early with sqrt(-3) = 2.  Didn't try 5.
 
Interesting.  I did the same thing, but quit early with sqrt(-3) = 2.  Didn't try 5.
 +
----
 +
[[HW7_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to HW7]]
 +
 +
[[Main_Page_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to MA453 Fall 2008]]

Latest revision as of 09:53, 21 March 2013


HW7 (Chapter 13, Problem 10) MA453, Fall 2008, Prof. Walther


I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation". Is that what they want?


I think what they want is something like this...

1/2 should be the multiplicative inverse of 2. In mod 7, the mult. inverse of 2 is 4 (4*2 = 2*4 = 8 mod 7 = 1). So 1/2 mod 7 could be interpreted as 4. Similar logic for the others.


I understand what you're saying for 1/2. It makes sense. But how does that follow for numbers like sqrt(-3)?


Well, we know that -3 mod 7 = 4. So we ask what elements in $ Z_7 $ square to get 4. 2^2 = 4. 5^2 = 25 = 4. So sqrt(-3) corresponds to 2 and 5.


Interesting. I did the same thing, but quit early with sqrt(-3) = 2. Didn't try 5.


Back to HW7

Back to MA453 Fall 2008

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva