(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Introduction<br>  ==
 
== Introduction<br>  ==
  
.....<br>  
+
Americans choose their President in a complicated series of steps that evolved through the history. In order to be depart from the monarchical tradition of Britain, the founding fathers of the United States created a system in which the American people had the power and responsibility to select their leader. To understand how the President of United States is selected, we first introduce the two categories of election.<br>  
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<u>Direct election</u><br>  
 
<u>Direct election</u><br>  
  
Direct election means choosing officeholders in which the voters directly cast ballots for the person, persons, political party they desire to see elected. The most commonly used systems are plurality system and two round system. Examples of direction election are the European Parliament and the United States Senate.  
+
Direct election means voters choose the officeholders directly. The most commonly used systems are plurality system and two round system. Examples of direction election are the European Parliament and the United States Senate.  
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<u>Indirect election</u><br>  
 
<u>Indirect election</u><br>  
  
By contrast, indirect election is a process the do not choose the candidate but elect people who will make the choice. It is one of the oldest form of elections. It is widely used in many union elections and sometimes in professional, civic, fraternal organizations. Because voters don’t vote for the the candidates directly, there will be occasions that candidates are elected without popularity, or the majority.<br>The United States president election is a typical indirect election system. Throughout the history of United States, four presidents were elected without winning popular votes.<br>  
+
By contrast, in an indirect election, rather than voting for officeholders directly, they vote for electors, and the officeholders were finally decided by the electors voted by the voters. It is widely used in many union elections Because voters don’t vote for the the candidates directly, there will be occasions that candidates are elected without popularity, or the majority.<br>The United States president election is a typical indirect election system. Throughout the history of United States, four presidents were elected without winning popular votes.<br>  
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
Line 41: Line 41:
 
After the above selections, there should be only one Presidential nominee in each party. In the same time, this candidate need to choose a Vice-Presidential candidate to run the election together. Voters should consider them as a whole team, so they cannot choose a Presidential candidate from one party and a Vice-Presidential candidate from another party.<br>  
 
After the above selections, there should be only one Presidential nominee in each party. In the same time, this candidate need to choose a Vice-Presidential candidate to run the election together. Voters should consider them as a whole team, so they cannot choose a Presidential candidate from one party and a Vice-Presidential candidate from another party.<br>  
  
Now, it is time for general election and electoral college election. Nevertheless, by very rare chance, if no presidential candidate receives more than half of the electoral votes, then the House of Representatives will choose the President among the top three presidential candidates and the Senate will choose the Vice-President among the top two candidates.<br>  
+
Now, it is time for general election and electoral college election. Nevertheless, by very rare chance, if no presidential candidate receives more than half of the electoral votes, then the House of Representatives will choose the President among the top three presidential candidates and the Senate will choose the Vice-President among the top two candidates. (This happens in 1824 for President John Quincy Adams)<br>  
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
Line 47: Line 47:
 
<u>the Popular Election</u>  
 
<u>the Popular Election</u>  
  
In the popular election, every citizen who is at legal age can vote. As a direct vote described in the beginning of this article, popular election is not how the United States President is chosen. By the United States Constitution, electoral college system is used to finalize the President and Vice-President.<br>  
+
In the popular election, every citizen who is at legal age can vote. As a direct vote described in the beginning of this article, popular election is not how the United States President is chosen. The Founding Fathers of the United States of America thoughts direct vote was too chaotic and easy to make mistake. Instead, they designed a new electoral college system.<br>  
  
<br><u>the Electoral college</u>  
+
<br>  
  
The United States electoral college is the institution which elected president and vice president every four years. Electors are appointed to each states and the district of columbia. The number of electors in each state is equal to the number of members of Congress to which the state is entitled, except the District of Columbia is granted at least three electors, according to Twenty-third Amendment. In total there are 528 electors, consisting of 435 representatives and 100 senators, plus the three electors from the District of Columbia.<br>  
+
<u>the Electoral college</u>  
  
Electors are pledged to particular presidential and vice presidential candidates, though unpledged electors are possible. In all states except Maine and Nebraska, electors are elected on a ‘winner-take-all’ basis. That is, all electors pledged to the presidential candidate who wins the most votes in a state become electors for that state. Main and Nebraska use the ‘congressional district method’, selecting one elector within each congressional district by popular votes and selecting the remaining two electors by a statewide popular vote.<br>
+
The United States electoral college is the institution which elected president and vice president every four years. According to article II of the United States Constitution, <br>Electors are appointed to each states and the district of columbia. There are 538 electors in total, 435 of which are representatives, 100 senators, and 3 electors from District of Columbia. The number of electors in each State is the same as the number of members in Congress.  
  
There are debates about electoral college, concerning its constraints in several aspects. First of all, the electoral college made it possible that a minority president ( one without popular votes) can be elected. The four presidents in the history of United States proved that the concern was not entirely unfounded.<br>
+
Electors are pledged to particular presidential and vice presidential candidates, though unpledged electors are possible. In most of the states, electors are elected on a ‘winner-take all’ basis. In Main and Nebraska, ‘congressional district method’ was used. one elector was elected in each congressional district by popular votes, and the other two electors are selected statewide by popular voting.  
  
Another constraint is the risk of so-called ‘faithless’ electors. A ‘faithless elector’ is one who is pledged to vote for his party’s candidate but nevertheless votes of another candidate. There have been 7 such electors in 20th century. Although none of the faithless electors changed the outcome of an election, the people’s wish of their election district were not appropriately represented.<br>
+
There are debates about electoral college. Some people say that there are constraints with electoral college, others argue that there are proponents despite the constraints. According to the article ‘the ELectoral College’, the constraints of Electoral Colleges are
  
There are also concerns about electoral college’s possible role in depressing voter turnout. Since each State is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the State to encourage voter participation. On the contrary, there may be even an incentive to discourage participation. A further outcome is that the public become less like to participate in voting, and the president then will be elected by a minor group of people in the country.<br>
+
*the possibility of electing a minority president
 +
*the risk of so-called "faithless" Electors,  
 +
*the possible role of the Electoral College in depressing voter turnout, and  
 +
*its failure to accurately reflect the national popular will.
  
Despite the constraints, supporters of electoral college claim that there are also proponents of the current system. One proponent of the electoral college is that it contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popula support to be elected president. With such a mechanism, a candidate is unlikely to win through the domination of one populous region over others or through the domination of large metropolitan areas over the rural ones. Thus, there is an incentive for presidential candidates to pull together coalitions of States and regions rather than exacerbate regional differences. This is especially important for large nations such as China, India, and United States.<br>  
+
Meanwhile, it has proponents are
 +
 
 +
*contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president  
 +
*enhances the status of minority interests,
 +
*contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system, and
 +
*maintains a federal system of government and representation.<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
== Presidents elected against popular votes in United States  ==
 +
 
 +
Although the electoral college system is a solid lasting compromise, it is not perfect. One major issue is that the winning candidate may not be winning the most popular votes. This happens several times in the history. The following cases show more details:<br>
 +
 
 +
{| width="468" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
| Year 1824
 +
| Presidential Candidates
 +
| Electoral votes
 +
| Popular votes
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| John Quincy Adams (won)
 +
| 84
 +
| 113,122
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Andrew Jackson
 +
| 91
 +
| 151,271
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| William H. Crawford<br>
 +
| 41<br>
 +
| 41,032<br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Henry Clay<br>
 +
| 37<br>
 +
| 47,545<br>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
*This is an rare case: even though Jackson earned the most electoral and popular votes, he failed to receive more than half of the electoral votes. The House of Representative chose Adams as the president. Candidate Adam won without being voted by most citizens.<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
{| width="467" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
| Year 1876<br>
 +
| Presidential Candidates <br>
 +
| Electoral votes <br>
 +
| Popular votes <br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Rutherford B. Hayes (won)<br>
 +
| 185<br>
 +
| 4,034,311<br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Samuel Tilden<br>
 +
| 184<br>
 +
| 4,288,546<br>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
{| width="468" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
| Year 1888
 +
| Presidential Candidates
 +
| Electoral votes
 +
| Popular votes
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Benjamin Harrison (won)
 +
| 233
 +
| 5,443,892
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Grover Cleveland
 +
| 168
 +
| 5,534,488
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Clinton Fisk<br>
 +
| 0<br>
 +
| 250,017<br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Alson Streeter<br>
 +
| 0<br>
 +
| 149,115<br>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
{| width="468" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
| Year 2000
 +
| Presidential Candidates
 +
| Electoral votes
 +
| Popular votes
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| George W. Bush (won)
 +
| 271
 +
| 50,456,002
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Al Gore
 +
| 266
 +
| 50,999,897
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Ralph Nader<br>
 +
| 0<br>
 +
| 2,882,955<br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Pat Buchanan<br>
 +
| 0<br>
 +
| 448,895<br>
 +
|-
 +
| <br>
 +
| Harry Browne<br>
 +
| 0<br>
 +
| 384,431<br>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
*The above three cases have one thing in common: the winning candidate earned the most electoral votes while another candidate earned more popular votes.<br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
== Electoral votes versus Popular votes<br>  ==
 +
 
 +
<u>National popular voting plan</u>
 +
 
 +
National popular voting is as introduced before, an alternative way to vote the president while guaranteeing the winner of election (etc, the President) received the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It can be more clearly told by its own website:
 +
 
 +
''"The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire United States. The bill preserves the Electoral College, while ensuring that every vote in every state will matter in every presidential election.''"
 +
 
 +
National popular voting plan (NPV) is started in purposing of making every vote same. It’s based on two state powers established in U.S. Constitution: states have plenary power to decide how to apportion their electoral votes and the states have the power to enter into binding interstate compacts. It has been introduced by state legislators in all 50 states and District of Columbia in December 2010. To join this plan, the legislators have to pass National Popular Vote Bill and signed it into law.
 +
 
 +
Currently, NPV is the most popular voting method candidate with the most supports to replace electoral votes. It is now proposed and waiting for votes. To make this proposal into effect, it needs 270 or more electoral votes to agree this system. As the latest news, Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee signs National Popular Vote bill in July 2013. And after that, there are 10 jurisdictions possessing 136 electoral votes (50.4% of the 270 electoral votes) in total joining this plan. Besides, at least one legislative chamber in 21 states (including AR, CO, CT, DE, ME, MI, NV, NM, NY, NC, and OR) have passed this bill. There are 2124 state legislators have endorsed the bill.<br>
 +
 
 +
*10 jurisdictions signed the National popular Vote bill into law<br>
 +
 
 +
{| width="468" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
| Jurisdiction
 +
| Electoral Votes
 +
| Passed time
 +
|-
 +
| District of Columbia
 +
| 3
 +
| September 21, 2010
 +
|-
 +
| Hawaii
 +
| 4
 +
| May 1, 2008
 +
|-
 +
| Illinois
 +
| 20
 +
| April 7, 2008
 +
|-
 +
| Maryland
 +
| 10
 +
| April 10, 2007
 +
|-
 +
| Massachusetts
 +
| 11
 +
| August 4, 2010
 +
|-
 +
| New Jersey
 +
| 14
 +
| January 13, 2008
 +
|-
 +
| Washington
 +
| 12
 +
| May 6, 2009
 +
|-
 +
| Vermont
 +
| 3
 +
| April 22, 2011
 +
|-
 +
| California
 +
| 55
 +
| August 8, 2011
 +
|-
 +
| Rhode Island
 +
| 4
 +
| July 12, 2013
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Ma279 vote.png|650x75px]]<br>
 +
 
 +
<u></u><br>
 +
 
 +
<u>Pros and Cons</u>
 +
 
 +
The pros and cons of NPV are still under discussion. Same as its current support rate, not all people think this is better than current voting system -- electoral votes, though it may caused the “unwilling” candidate becomes the president.
 +
 
 +
Supporters of NPV claim that this voting system will, obviously, give a fairer result. This can intuitively present the supporting rate of all candidates, and never let a candidate who lost the popular vote win as it original purpose. Meanwhile, they argued that the candidates put too much emphasis on large swing states and therefore negating smaller states under electoral votes system. <br>However, critics give different comments. They believe that NPV will discourage candidates from campaigning and paying attention to sparsely populated regions of the country. This will lead the problem that the rural America is neglected and densely populated cities, for example, are focused too intently. <br>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
== Conclusion<br>  ==
 +
 
 +
In fact, presidential elections in Austria, Finland, Portugal, Russia and other east European states are make use of various forms of majority electoral systems. And because in order for a presidential candidate to win, he or she must get 50%-plus-one electoral votes, the majority system is also a part of the US Electoral College. Only if no candidate reaches the 50% mark, the House of Representatives will decide the election. At that time, the US presidential race is a strict plurality system to determine who votes for whom in the Electoral College. <br>
 +
 
 +
<br>  
  
Proponents also point out that Electoral College actually enhance the status of minority groups rather than depressing voter participation. This is because the voters of even small minorities in a State may make the difference between winning all of that State’s electoral votes or none of that State’s electoral votes.<br>  
+
== Reference:<br> ==
  
Proponents also argue that the Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two party system. This is true because it is extremely difficult for a new o minor party to win enough popular votes in enough States to have a chance of winning the presidency. Even if they win enough electoral votes to force the decision into the US House of Representatives, they would still have to have a majority of over half the State delegation in order to elect their candidate, in which case they will hardly be considered to be a minor party.<br><br>  
+
Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_election http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_election]<br>Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_election http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_election]<br>United States Constitution: [http://2008election.procon.org/sourcefiles/USConstitution.pdf http://2008election.procon.org/sourcefiles/USConstitution.pdf]<br>The Electoral College: [http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php]<br>President election history: [http://2008election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=001565 http://2008election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=001565]<br>National Popular Vote Bill has passed half-way point: [http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/ http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/]<br>  
  
== Reference: ==
+
About.com US politics: [http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/a/3-Ways-To-Bypass-The-Electoral-College.htm http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/a/3-Ways-To-Bypass-The-Electoral-College.htm]<br>
 +
----
 +
[[2013_Fall_MA_279_Walther|Back to MA279 Fall 2013]]
  
[[ http://2008election.procon.org/sourcefiles/USConstitution.pdf|<br>http://2008election.procon.org/sourcefiles/USConstitution.pdf]]<br>[http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php]<br><br>
+
[[Category:MA279Fall2013Walther]]
 +
[[Category:math]]
 +
[[Category:project]]

Latest revision as of 16:23, 1 December 2013

Presidents and others that have been elected against majority

By Antong Li, Mengyao Wang, Chenlin Zhou, and Yi Hu.


Introduction

Americans choose their President in a complicated series of steps that evolved through the history. In order to be depart from the monarchical tradition of Britain, the founding fathers of the United States created a system in which the American people had the power and responsibility to select their leader. To understand how the President of United States is selected, we first introduce the two categories of election.


Direct election

Direct election means voters choose the officeholders directly. The most commonly used systems are plurality system and two round system. Examples of direction election are the European Parliament and the United States Senate.


Indirect election

By contrast, in an indirect election, rather than voting for officeholders directly, they vote for electors, and the officeholders were finally decided by the electors voted by the voters. It is widely used in many union elections Because voters don’t vote for the the candidates directly, there will be occasions that candidates are elected without popularity, or the majority.
The United States president election is a typical indirect election system. Throughout the history of United States, four presidents were elected without winning popular votes.


Presidents election in United States

Election process

According to Article II of the United States Constitution,

Article II
Section 1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:
...No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
”,

a person has to meet the following requirements to be a candidate for the presidency:

  • At least 35 years old
  • A natural born citizen
  • A resident of the United States for 14 years

There will be many candidates for the presidency every year, and everyone has their own political views and preferable parties. Some of them will have similar ideas, so usually there are more than one candidate in the same political party. However, each party should only has one candidate to run for President. Therefore, a nominating process is needed for every parties. A series of the presidential primary elections and caucuses held in each state and territory in U.S, and presidential nominating conventions held in each political party are two main ideas to select one final nominee. (There are some people decide to run for the President without being a part of any political party, but such independent candidates need other requirement to stay on the campaign)

After the above selections, there should be only one Presidential nominee in each party. In the same time, this candidate need to choose a Vice-Presidential candidate to run the election together. Voters should consider them as a whole team, so they cannot choose a Presidential candidate from one party and a Vice-Presidential candidate from another party.

Now, it is time for general election and electoral college election. Nevertheless, by very rare chance, if no presidential candidate receives more than half of the electoral votes, then the House of Representatives will choose the President among the top three presidential candidates and the Senate will choose the Vice-President among the top two candidates. (This happens in 1824 for President John Quincy Adams)


the Popular Election

In the popular election, every citizen who is at legal age can vote. As a direct vote described in the beginning of this article, popular election is not how the United States President is chosen. The Founding Fathers of the United States of America thoughts direct vote was too chaotic and easy to make mistake. Instead, they designed a new electoral college system.


the Electoral college

The United States electoral college is the institution which elected president and vice president every four years. According to article II of the United States Constitution,
Electors are appointed to each states and the district of columbia. There are 538 electors in total, 435 of which are representatives, 100 senators, and 3 electors from District of Columbia. The number of electors in each State is the same as the number of members in Congress.

Electors are pledged to particular presidential and vice presidential candidates, though unpledged electors are possible. In most of the states, electors are elected on a ‘winner-take all’ basis. In Main and Nebraska, ‘congressional district method’ was used. one elector was elected in each congressional district by popular votes, and the other two electors are selected statewide by popular voting.

There are debates about electoral college. Some people say that there are constraints with electoral college, others argue that there are proponents despite the constraints. According to the article ‘the ELectoral College’, the constraints of Electoral Colleges are

  • the possibility of electing a minority president
  • the risk of so-called "faithless" Electors,
  • the possible role of the Electoral College in depressing voter turnout, and
  • its failure to accurately reflect the national popular will.

Meanwhile, it has proponents are

  • contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president
  • enhances the status of minority interests,
  • contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system, and
  • maintains a federal system of government and representation.


Presidents elected against popular votes in United States

Although the electoral college system is a solid lasting compromise, it is not perfect. One major issue is that the winning candidate may not be winning the most popular votes. This happens several times in the history. The following cases show more details:

Year 1824 Presidential Candidates Electoral votes Popular votes

John Quincy Adams (won) 84 113,122

Andrew Jackson 91 151,271

William H. Crawford
41
41,032

Henry Clay
37
47,545
  • This is an rare case: even though Jackson earned the most electoral and popular votes, he failed to receive more than half of the electoral votes. The House of Representative chose Adams as the president. Candidate Adam won without being voted by most citizens.


Year 1876
Presidential Candidates
Electoral votes
Popular votes

Rutherford B. Hayes (won)
185
4,034,311

Samuel Tilden
184
4,288,546


Year 1888 Presidential Candidates Electoral votes Popular votes

Benjamin Harrison (won) 233 5,443,892

Grover Cleveland 168 5,534,488

Clinton Fisk
0
250,017

Alson Streeter
0
149,115


Year 2000 Presidential Candidates Electoral votes Popular votes

George W. Bush (won) 271 50,456,002

Al Gore 266 50,999,897

Ralph Nader
0
2,882,955

Pat Buchanan
0
448,895

Harry Browne
0
384,431
  • The above three cases have one thing in common: the winning candidate earned the most electoral votes while another candidate earned more popular votes.


Electoral votes versus Popular votes

National popular voting plan

National popular voting is as introduced before, an alternative way to vote the president while guaranteeing the winner of election (etc, the President) received the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It can be more clearly told by its own website:

"The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire United States. The bill preserves the Electoral College, while ensuring that every vote in every state will matter in every presidential election."

National popular voting plan (NPV) is started in purposing of making every vote same. It’s based on two state powers established in U.S. Constitution: states have plenary power to decide how to apportion their electoral votes and the states have the power to enter into binding interstate compacts. It has been introduced by state legislators in all 50 states and District of Columbia in December 2010. To join this plan, the legislators have to pass National Popular Vote Bill and signed it into law.

Currently, NPV is the most popular voting method candidate with the most supports to replace electoral votes. It is now proposed and waiting for votes. To make this proposal into effect, it needs 270 or more electoral votes to agree this system. As the latest news, Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee signs National Popular Vote bill in July 2013. And after that, there are 10 jurisdictions possessing 136 electoral votes (50.4% of the 270 electoral votes) in total joining this plan. Besides, at least one legislative chamber in 21 states (including AR, CO, CT, DE, ME, MI, NV, NM, NY, NC, and OR) have passed this bill. There are 2124 state legislators have endorsed the bill.

  • 10 jurisdictions signed the National popular Vote bill into law
Jurisdiction Electoral Votes Passed time
District of Columbia 3 September 21, 2010
Hawaii 4 May 1, 2008
Illinois 20 April 7, 2008
Maryland 10 April 10, 2007
Massachusetts 11 August 4, 2010
New Jersey 14 January 13, 2008
Washington 12 May 6, 2009
Vermont 3 April 22, 2011
California 55 August 8, 2011
Rhode Island 4 July 12, 2013

Ma279 vote.png


Pros and Cons

The pros and cons of NPV are still under discussion. Same as its current support rate, not all people think this is better than current voting system -- electoral votes, though it may caused the “unwilling” candidate becomes the president.

Supporters of NPV claim that this voting system will, obviously, give a fairer result. This can intuitively present the supporting rate of all candidates, and never let a candidate who lost the popular vote win as it original purpose. Meanwhile, they argued that the candidates put too much emphasis on large swing states and therefore negating smaller states under electoral votes system.
However, critics give different comments. They believe that NPV will discourage candidates from campaigning and paying attention to sparsely populated regions of the country. This will lead the problem that the rural America is neglected and densely populated cities, for example, are focused too intently.


Conclusion

In fact, presidential elections in Austria, Finland, Portugal, Russia and other east European states are make use of various forms of majority electoral systems. And because in order for a presidential candidate to win, he or she must get 50%-plus-one electoral votes, the majority system is also a part of the US Electoral College. Only if no candidate reaches the 50% mark, the House of Representatives will decide the election. At that time, the US presidential race is a strict plurality system to determine who votes for whom in the Electoral College.


Reference:

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_election
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_election
United States Constitution: http://2008election.procon.org/sourcefiles/USConstitution.pdf
The Electoral College: http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_procon.php
President election history: http://2008election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=001565
National Popular Vote Bill has passed half-way point: http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

About.com US politics: http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/a/3-Ways-To-Bypass-The-Electoral-College.htm


Back to MA279 Fall 2013

Alumni Liaison

BSEE 2004, current Ph.D. student researching signal and image processing.

Landis Huffman