Line 13: Line 13:
 
* [[number thirteen is walkin' the plank]]
 
* [[number thirteen is walkin' the plank]]
 
* [[number fourteen (too lazy to come up with something else pirately to say)]]
 
* [[number fourteen (too lazy to come up with something else pirately to say)]]
 +
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
'''Judgment Day'''
 +
 +
1.  You need absolute values everywhere.  No points deducted, since it's clear you understand what you're doing, but it's sloppy to the point where you might offend a grader. 
 +
POINTS: 1/1
 +
 +
2.  Good.
 +
POINTS: 2/2
 +
 +
3.  Good.
 +
POINTS: 3/3
 +
 +
4.  You have to remind the reader that <math>L^2(I) \subset L^1(I)</math>.  I know what you're doing, but the grader might not.
 +
POINTS: 4/4
 +
 +
5.  Good.
 +
POINTS: 5/5
 +
 +
6.  You need continuity of <math>\hat{f}</math>!  It seems implicit in the proof, especially since we already did that question, but this would be marked wrong on a qual. 
 +
POINTS: 5.9/6
 +
 +
7.  Good.
 +
POINTS: 6.9/7
 +
 +
11. The line involving the MVT is a mess.  I would have no idea what you were talking about.  Also, the <math>\displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0^+}</math> is superfluous (and wrong).  A fix would be that there exists <math>\eta_h</math> such that <math>0< |\eta_h|< |h| </math>.  You also need to cite Fubini/Tonelli when you interchange products.  Full points awarded, however.
 +
POINTS: 7.9/11
 +
 +
13. a) This one can't be saved.  The definition of <math> ||\hat{f}||_{\infty}</math> is wrong, and you need that <math>\hat{f}</math> is continuous to conclude that <math>||\hat{f}||_{\infty} = \sup \{ |\hat{f}(x)| \} </math>.
 +
   
 +
    b) As noted, the inverse fourier transform is only equal a.e. to f.  Needs more work.
 +
POINTS: 7.9/13
 +
 +
14. The change of variables is not correct.  You need to replace <math>x</math> with <math>Ax</math>.  Then <math>A^T A x = x</math> since <math>A</math> is orthogonal.
 +
POINTS: 8.9/14
 +
 +
TOTAL POINTS: 8.9

Revision as of 18:18, 30 July 2009

Dead astern to MA_598R_pweigel_Summer_2009_Lecture_7



Judgment Day

1. You need absolute values everywhere. No points deducted, since it's clear you understand what you're doing, but it's sloppy to the point where you might offend a grader. POINTS: 1/1

2. Good. POINTS: 2/2

3. Good. POINTS: 3/3

4. You have to remind the reader that $ L^2(I) \subset L^1(I) $. I know what you're doing, but the grader might not. POINTS: 4/4

5. Good. POINTS: 5/5

6. You need continuity of $ \hat{f} $! It seems implicit in the proof, especially since we already did that question, but this would be marked wrong on a qual. POINTS: 5.9/6

7. Good. POINTS: 6.9/7

11. The line involving the MVT is a mess. I would have no idea what you were talking about. Also, the $ \displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0^+} $ is superfluous (and wrong). A fix would be that there exists $ \eta_h $ such that $ 0< |\eta_h|< |h| $. You also need to cite Fubini/Tonelli when you interchange products. Full points awarded, however. POINTS: 7.9/11

13. a) This one can't be saved. The definition of $ ||\hat{f}||_{\infty} $ is wrong, and you need that $ \hat{f} $ is continuous to conclude that $ ||\hat{f}||_{\infty} = \sup \{ |\hat{f}(x)| \} $.

   b) As noted, the inverse fourier transform is only equal a.e. to f.  Needs more work.

POINTS: 7.9/13

14. The change of variables is not correct. You need to replace $ x $ with $ Ax $. Then $ A^T A x = x $ since $ A $ is orthogonal. POINTS: 8.9/14

TOTAL POINTS: 8.9

Alumni Liaison

Sees the importance of signal filtering in medical imaging

Dhruv Lamba, BSEE2010