| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Two issues with the definition of a stable system. It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if '''any''' bounded '''input''' yields a bounded '''output'''". The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for '''any''' input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik | Two issues with the definition of a stable system. It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if '''any''' bounded '''input''' yields a bounded '''output'''". The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for '''any''' input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
You must have fixed what jeff was complaining about, because when I read it it was correct. Good Job. | You must have fixed what jeff was complaining about, because when I read it it was correct. Good Job. | ||
-Collin Phillips | -Collin Phillips | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 18 September 2008
hey,your definitions are very good.It not only defines ,but also explains through your examples.Even my concept of stable system is quite cleared after going through your definition.-ananya
Two issues with the definition of a stable system. It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if any bounded input yields a bounded output". The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for any input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik
You must have fixed what jeff was complaining about, because when I read it it was correct. Good Job. -Collin Phillips
