Line 3: Line 3:
 
----
 
----
 
Two issues with the definition of a stable system.  It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if '''any''' bounded '''input''' yields a bounded '''output'''".  The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for '''any''' input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik
 
Two issues with the definition of a stable system.  It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if '''any''' bounded '''input''' yields a bounded '''output'''".  The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for '''any''' input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik
 +
 +
You must have fixed what jeff was complaining about, because when I read it it was correct.  Good Job.
 +
-Collin Phillips

Revision as of 07:52, 18 September 2008

hey,your definitions are very good.It not only defines ,but also explains through your examples.Even my concept of stable system is quite cleared after going through your definition.-ananya


Two issues with the definition of a stable system. It should be worded as "A system is therefore said to be bounded if any bounded input yields a bounded output". The words output/input were switched, and the definition must be stated for any input, as all possible bounded inputs must yield a bounded output (otherwise it is unbounded). -- Jeff Kubascik

You must have fixed what jeff was complaining about, because when I read it it was correct. Good Job. -Collin Phillips

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood