Revision as of 15:33, 19 September 2008 by Serdbrue (Talk)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Your definitions seem clear and accurate, but an example of a causal system might help. --Ben Laskowski

Short and to the point. I like the formality of your definitions. The example also helps make sure the reader understands what you're talking about. -Phil Cannon

I like how your definition is short and to the point. However, you may want to note that a non-causal signal may depend on past and present input signals, in addition to future input signals. --Brian Thomas

Your definition is very short and easy to understand. You also give an example to help illustrate the point which I think is really useful. - Bavorndej Chanyasak

Clear to the point definition. It is easy to understand what a causal/noncausal system is using your definition. -Scott E

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood