(Brian Thomas Rhea HW3.a "Grading") |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh | Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh | ||
| − | I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant. (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math> | + | I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant. (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math>.) -Brian Thomas |
Revision as of 06:18, 18 September 2008
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying $ |x(t)| < \epsilon $ isn't technically correct, assuming you mean $ \epsilon $ to be a real constant. (One should say $ \forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon $.) -Brian Thomas
