(New page: After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me ...) |
(→if right approach??: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve | ||
| + | it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me know about it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == if right approach?? == | ||
| + | |||
After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve | After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve | ||
it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me know about it. | it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me know about it. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:39, 15 October 2008
After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me know about it.
if right approach??
After converting, what we get is a common Rayleigh distribution. We can then solve it by intergrating over 'theta' . Do you guys think if its a correct approach. If not then please let me know about it.
