(Brian Thomas Rhea HW3.A "Grading")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Your definition is very clear,and brief.But if you could show it  diagramatically,it would hav been better.-ananya Panja
 
Your definition is very clear,and brief.But if you could show it  diagramatically,it would hav been better.-ananya Panja
  
 
+
----
  
 
Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point.  -Christen Juzeszyn
 
Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point.  -Christen Juzeszyn
Line 13: Line 13:
 
This is a good definition for a time-variant/invariant system but it was a little confusing on the first read-through.  
 
This is a good definition for a time-variant/invariant system but it was a little confusing on the first read-through.  
 
-Aishwar Sabesan
 
-Aishwar Sabesan
 
  
 
----
 
----
Line 22: Line 21:
  
 
The definitions are short, to the point, and correct, though I probably would have given "the output" an actual name (such as y(t) (or y[n])) for sake of clarity.  -Brian Thomas
 
The definitions are short, to the point, and correct, though I probably would have given "the output" an actual name (such as y(t) (or y[n])) for sake of clarity.  -Brian Thomas
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Your definition is correct but I would agree with adding a name for the response.

Revision as of 12:05, 18 September 2008

Your definition is very clear,and brief.But if you could show it diagramatically,it would hav been better.-ananya Panja


Your definitions seem good to me, both correct and to the point. -Christen Juzeszyn


This is a complete and correct definition. However, I would have worded it differently. The way it is currently is a little confusing regarding the shifted output. I would have said "...yields the same result as time shifting the output signal by the same time shift.", but this definition is nonetheless correct and quite usable. -Zachary Curosh


This is a good definition for a time-variant/invariant system but it was a little confusing on the first read-through. -Aishwar Sabesan


I think definition of a time variant and invariant is very solid. -- Sangwan Han


The definitions are short, to the point, and correct, though I probably would have given "the output" an actual name (such as y(t) (or y[n])) for sake of clarity. -Brian Thomas


Your definition is correct but I would agree with adding a name for the response.

Alumni Liaison

Recent Math PhD now doing a post-doctorate at UC Riverside.

Kuei-Nuan Lin