| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Correct and to the point - Ronny Wijaya | Correct and to the point - Ronny Wijaya | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | These definitions are concise and correct, but adding a few examples or a mathematical definition would help as well. As mentioned above, a non-causal system may depend on future inputs or on future inputs and past and present or both. -Zachary Curosh | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 16 September 2008
Your definition of causality seems sufficient, but you may want to mention in your definition of non-causal if the outputs are only affected by future inputs or if past and present inputs can affect the output as well. -Ryan Scott
Your definitions of causal and non-causal systems look good to me. -Christen Juzeszyn
Your definitions look good. You may want to consider adding some examples as well. - Joseph Mazzei
Correct and to the point - Ronny Wijaya
These definitions are concise and correct, but adding a few examples or a mathematical definition would help as well. As mentioned above, a non-causal system may depend on future inputs or on future inputs and past and present or both. -Zachary Curosh
