Line 49: Line 49:
 
=== Answer 3  ===
 
=== Answer 3  ===
  
If there is not a t on top (i.e it is back to being a '1'), then the signal is bounded.  
+
If there is not a t on top (i.e it is back to being a '1'), then the signal is bounded*.  
  
 
Considering the case where <math>|x(t)| \le \infty</math> then <math>0<\frac{{1}}{1+x^2(t)}\le1</math>.  
 
Considering the case where <math>|x(t)| \le \infty</math> then <math>0<\frac{{1}}{1+x^2(t)}\le1</math>.  
  
<math>\therefore y(t)</math> is bounded by <math>-1 \le M \le 1</math>  
+
<math>\therefore y(t)</math> is bounded by <math>M = \pm 1</math>  
  
'''Addendum''': This only works for <math>x(t) \in \Re</math>&nbsp;as there are imaginary values that cause it to be unstable.
+
 
 +
'''*Addendum''': This only works for <math>x(t) \in \Re</math>&nbsp;as there are imaginary values that cause it to be unstable.  
  
 
--[[User:Darichar|Darichar]] 14:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)  
 
--[[User:Darichar|Darichar]] 14:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)  

Revision as of 12:34, 26 January 2011

Practice Question on System Stability

The input x(t) and the output y(t) of a system are related by the equation

$ y(t)=\frac{ {\color{red} t }}{1+x^2(t)}. $

Is the system stable? Answer yes/no and ustify your answer.

OOPS, I actually meant to put a "t" on top of the fraction (now in red). -pm

Share your answers below

You will receive feedback from your instructor and TA directly on this page. Other students are welcome to comment/discuss/point out mistakes/ask questions too!


Answer 1

This system is stable. I'm actually not sure how to show this, does the following logic work?

$ \lim_{x(t) \to 0}\frac{1}{1+x^2(t)} = 1 $ and $ \frac{1}{1+x^2(t)} < 1 $ for all x(t), thus the system is stable.

I'm not sure that the justification works here...

--Cmcmican 17:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. Here is how you should go about answering such questions. If you think it is stable,
then assume that x(t) is bounded (i.e., |x(t)|<m ) and then try to show that y(t) is also bounded (|y(t)<M ).
If you think it is not stable, then try to think of a bounded signal x(t) for which y(t) would not be bounded.


Hint for this case: Look at the constant signal x(t)=1. -pm

Answer 2

Now that it has a t on top, it's not bounded.

If you consider the constant signal x(t)=1, then $ y(t) = \frac{{t }}{1+1^2} = \frac{{t }}{2} $, which is not bounded.

--Cmcmican 19:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Good! And what if there was no t on top? -pm

Answer 3

If there is not a t on top (i.e it is back to being a '1'), then the signal is bounded*.

Considering the case where $ |x(t)| \le \infty $ then $ 0<\frac{{1}}{1+x^2(t)}\le1 $.

$ \therefore y(t) $ is bounded by $ M = \pm 1 $


*Addendum: This only works for $ x(t) \in \Re $ as there are imaginary values that cause it to be unstable.

--Darichar 14:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)





Back to ECE301 Spring 2011 Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang