Line 39: Line 39:
 
<br> <math>S_k(i, j) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}|P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)| & \text{ if } (i = ii \text{ and }  \  j \neq jj \  )\text{ or }(j = jj \text{ and }  \  i \neq ii \  ) \\ |P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)|/\sqrt2 & \text{ if } (\  i \neq ii \ \text{ and }  \  j \neq jj \  )\end{array}\right.</math>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;( 6 )<br>  
 
<br> <math>S_k(i, j) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}|P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)| & \text{ if } (i = ii \text{ and }  \  j \neq jj \  )\text{ or }(j = jj \text{ and }  \  i \neq ii \  ) \\ |P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)|/\sqrt2 & \text{ if } (\  i \neq ii \ \text{ and }  \  j \neq jj \  )\end{array}\right.</math>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;( 6 )<br>  
  
== S(i, j) = Max[S<sub>k</sub>(i, j)] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; k = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;( 7 ) ==
+
== ''S(i, j) ''= Max[''S<sub>k</sub>(i, j'')] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; k = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;( 7 ) ==
 +
 
 +
where ''S(i, j)'' is the value of the slope magnitude at location ''(i, j)'', ''P(i, j)'' is the pixel intensity value at location ''(i, j)''
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  

Revision as of 07:58, 6 December 2011


Similarity analysis of images

Mona2.jpg

Look at the Mona Lisa(s) above. They are very similar, aren't they? It's obvious, and you can say that they have high similarity. But given the pictures below, how to determine the similarity? Let's see!

Emo mona lisa.jpg



Introduction & Background

Generally, there are two criteria to determine image similarity, the coefficient of determination (R2) and the mean absolute error (MAE). Here in this project, I use the coefficient of determination for similarity analysis.

The computation of R2 is:

                       $ R2 = 1 - {\sum_{i=1}^N (y_i - y_{pre})^2 / \sum_{i=1}^N (y_i - y_{avg})^2 } $              ( 1 )

          or          $ R2 = \frac{SS_{xy}^2}{SS_{xx} SS_{yy} } $                                                                         ( 2 )

       where       $ SS_{xy} = \sum_{i=1}^N (y_i - y_{avg})(x_i - x_{avg}) $                                  ( 3 )       

                       $ SS_{yy} = \sum_{i=1}^N (y_i - y_{avg})^2 $                                                           ( 4 )

                       $ SS_{xx} = \sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - x_{avg})^2 $                                                          ( 5 )

Where N is the total number of the components. x is the value of reference image, y is the value of the other image. xavg is the mean of the x values and yavg is the mean of the y values.

The meaning of R2: R2 value varies from 0 to 1. 1 means perfect fit between models, 0 means very poor fit; a good fit if R2 >0.8, and poor fit if R2<0.3.


I think to compute the similarity between models, two components should be considered : the vein and luminance. I use the color histogram to determine the similarity of luminance and slope for vein.
The slope magnitude within a 3 x 3 mask is defined as follows:


$ S_k(i, j) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}|P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)| & \text{ if } (i = ii \text{ and } \ j \neq jj \ )\text{ or }(j = jj \text{ and } \ i \neq ii \ ) \\ |P(i, j) - P(ii, jj)|/\sqrt2 & \text{ if } (\ i \neq ii \ \text{ and } \ j \neq jj \ )\end{array}\right. $        ( 6 )

S(i, j) = Max[Sk(i, j)]                                 k = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7                                        ( 7 )

where S(i, j) is the value of the slope magnitude at location (i, j), P(i, j) is the pixel intensity value at location (i, j)








                                                 ...to be continued






Back to 2011 Fall ECE 438 Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva