m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]] | ||
| + | |||
I like theorems and such, but i think having a favortie one is kind of wierd. I do like Euler's famous formula relating imaginary numbers to sines and cosines. But I'm sure that some one has used that, so I will say that more specifically, i think it is cool when this formula is cool when evaluated at Pi. | I like theorems and such, but i think having a favortie one is kind of wierd. I do like Euler's famous formula relating imaginary numbers to sines and cosines. But I'm sure that some one has used that, so I will say that more specifically, i think it is cool when this formula is cool when evaluated at Pi. | ||
| − | <math>e^(i* | + | <math>e^(i*pi) = -1</math> |
This can be written as | This can be written as | ||
| − | <math>e^(i* | + | <math>e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0</math> |
to relate five of the most important numbers to each other in a very simple way. | to relate five of the most important numbers to each other in a very simple way. | ||
If someone else already used this, then I'm sorry for that. | If someone else already used this, then I'm sorry for that. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:24, 30 January 2009
I like theorems and such, but i think having a favortie one is kind of wierd. I do like Euler's famous formula relating imaginary numbers to sines and cosines. But I'm sure that some one has used that, so I will say that more specifically, i think it is cool when this formula is cool when evaluated at Pi.
$ e^(i*pi) = -1 $
This can be written as
$ e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 $
to relate five of the most important numbers to each other in a very simple way. If someone else already used this, then I'm sorry for that.
