| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review | + | * Review Soonho Kwon |
| + | |||
| + | I like the fact that you have used specific numbers for the example part. By doing so, it was actually very easy to understand. However, I wish there were a little bit more explanation of how the equations progress. | ||
| + | |||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 12:25, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Yijun Han
The derivations are clear and concise. When sampling at a sample frequency below the Nyquist rate, the reason why aliasing occurs is well explained. But there is a typo on the second figure. The frequency of the last delta should be 2pi*330/550 instead of 2pi*770/550.
- Author answer here
- Review Soonho Kwon
I like the fact that you have used specific numbers for the example part. By doing so, it was actually very easy to understand. However, I wish there were a little bit more explanation of how the equations progress.
- Author answer here
- Review by student 3
- Author answer here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
