(New page: Category:MA453Spring2009WaltherIf <math>\scriptstyle p</math> is a prime and <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1a_2\cdots a_n</math>, then <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1</math> or <math>\...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]]If <math>\scriptstyle p</math> is a prime and <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1a_2\cdots a_n</math>, then <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2a_3\cdots a_n</math>. If <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1</math>, we are done. Otherwise, <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_3a_4\cdots a_n</math>. This continues iteratively until <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1}a_n</math>. Then <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1}</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_n</math>, and it is clear that <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_i</math> for some <math>\scriptstyle1\ \le\ i\ \le\ n</math>. <math>\scriptstyle\Box</math>
 
[[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]]If <math>\scriptstyle p</math> is a prime and <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1a_2\cdots a_n</math>, then <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2a_3\cdots a_n</math>. If <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1</math>, we are done. Otherwise, <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_3a_4\cdots a_n</math>. This continues iteratively until <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1}a_n</math>. Then <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1}</math> or <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_n</math>, and it is clear that <math>\scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_i</math> for some <math>\scriptstyle1\ \le\ i\ \le\ n</math>. <math>\scriptstyle\Box</math>
  
:--[[User:Narupley|Narupley]] 00:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
+
:--[[User:Narupley|Nick Rupley]] 00:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:28, 21 January 2009

If $ \scriptstyle p $ is a prime and $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1a_2\cdots a_n $, then $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1 $ or $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2a_3\cdots a_n $. If $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_1 $, we are done. Otherwise, $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_2 $ or $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_3a_4\cdots a_n $. This continues iteratively until $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1}a_n $. Then $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_{n-1} $ or $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_n $, and it is clear that $ \scriptstyle p\ \mid\ a_i $ for some $ \scriptstyle1\ \le\ i\ \le\ n $. $ \scriptstyle\Box $

--Nick Rupley 00:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Prof. Math. Ohio State and Associate Dean
Outstanding Alumnus Purdue Math 2008

Jeff McNeal