(New page: "I think you start by working the maximum likelihood estimation formula of a binomial RV. The number of photons captured is (1,000,000) and the probability of the camera catching a photon ...)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
But to find the maximum I think you have to take the derivative of an n!... Does anyone know how to do this? Or am I going about the problem completely wrong?"
 
But to find the maximum I think you have to take the derivative of an n!... Does anyone know how to do this? Or am I going about the problem completely wrong?"
 +
 +
  
 
Quote from Beau, here is what we needed to do.
 
Quote from Beau, here is what we needed to do.

Revision as of 11:52, 10 November 2008

"I think you start by working the maximum likelihood estimation formula of a binomial RV. The number of photons captured is (1,000,000) and the probability of the camera catching a photon is p, n (the number of photons total) is what we are looking for.

$ \hat n_{ML} = \text{max}_n ( \binom{n}{k} p^{k} (1-p)^{n-k} ) $

$ \hat n_{ML} = \text{max}_n ( \binom{n}{1000000} p^{1000000} (1-p)^{n-1000000} ) $

But to find the maximum I think you have to take the derivative of an n!... Does anyone know how to do this? Or am I going about the problem completely wrong?"


Quote from Beau, here is what we needed to do.

1st) we know that for n+1 must be smaller than n

2nd) same thing we know from n-1 must be greater than n

then from sandwich theorem, obtain a inequality with n+1<n<n+1

solve for n.

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang