| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | |||
*Review by Miguel Castellanos | *Review by Miguel Castellanos | ||
You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem. | You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | |||
*Review by Yijun Han | *Review by Yijun Han | ||
Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies. | Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | |||
*Review by Soonho Kwon | *Review by Soonho Kwon | ||
It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job! | It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job! | ||
| − | * | + | ---- |
| + | *Review by Hyungsuk Kim | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is good to see the well drawn graphs however it would be better if you put some formulas and explanations about those two graphs. And it would be more understandable if you put some examples.<br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by Yerkebulan Y | ||
| − | + | Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by Fabian Faes | ||
| + | |||
| + | I do agree with everybody else that this is a clear and concise explanation, however for my liking I would have preferred more explanations and more detailed graph. The math listed and the graphs shown did however express a clear and logical idea. Overall a simple and straightforward slecture. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by student 7 | ||
| − | + | Author Answers here | |
| − | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by student 8 | ||
| + | Author Answers here | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by student 9 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Author Answers here | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | *Review by student 10 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Author Answers here | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
Revision as of 22:34, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for Nyquist Theorem
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Miguel Castellanos
You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem.
- Review by Yijun Han
Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies.
- Review by Soonho Kwon
It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job!
- Review by Hyungsuk Kim
It is good to see the well drawn graphs however it would be better if you put some formulas and explanations about those two graphs. And it would be more understandable if you put some examples.
- Review by Yerkebulan Y
Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked.
- Review by Fabian Faes
I do agree with everybody else that this is a clear and concise explanation, however for my liking I would have preferred more explanations and more detailed graph. The math listed and the graphs shown did however express a clear and logical idea. Overall a simple and straightforward slecture.
- Review by student 7
Author Answers here
- Review by student 8
Author Answers here
- Review by student 9
Author Answers here
- Review by student 10
Author Answers here
