| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | <center><font size="4"></font> | + | <center><font size="4"></font> |
<font size="4">Questions and Comments for </font> <font size="4">[[Slecture Nyquist Theorem Stein|Nyquist Theorem]] </font> | <font size="4">Questions and Comments for </font> <font size="4">[[Slecture Nyquist Theorem Stein|Nyquist Theorem]] </font> | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Review by Yerkebulan Y. | ||
| + | *Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
[[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]] | [[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]] | ||
[[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:Review]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]] | [[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:Review]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]] | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for Nyquist Theorem
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Miguel Castellanos
You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem.
- Author answer here
- Review by Yijun Han
Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies.
- Author answer here
- Review by Soonho Kwon
It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job!
- Author answer here
- Review by Hyungsuk Kim
- It is good to see the well drawn graphs however it would be better if you put some formulas and explanations about those two graphs. And it would be more understandable if you put some examples.
- Author answer here
- Review by Yerkebulan Y.
- Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked.
