Line 10: Line 10:
 
My personal favorite are Zeno's paradoxs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_paradox. Every one of them seems to be valid mathematically, but all of them defy common sense. The reason for this is that Zeno bases the the assumption that you cannot infinitely divide something. Eventually you get to the smallest unit of time or distance, and then you can't break it down anymore.
 
My personal favorite are Zeno's paradoxs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_paradox. Every one of them seems to be valid mathematically, but all of them defy common sense. The reason for this is that Zeno bases the the assumption that you cannot infinitely divide something. Eventually you get to the smallest unit of time or distance, and then you can't break it down anymore.
  
 +
[[Category:MA375Spring2010Walther]]
 +
 +
I dont have any theorems in mind but i always wanted to derive the general formula of a fibonnaci sequence based of basic math like not using the ideas of progression or any other general forms.If we could do it any way that is similar to Gauss.
 
[[Category:MA375Spring2010Walther]]
 
[[Category:MA375Spring2010Walther]]

Revision as of 10:50, 22 January 2010

Post your favorite theorem and discuss it a little.

I don't have a favorite theorem necessarily, but here's one of my favorites: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox

This is a completely counterintuitive notion of which I have virtually no understanding, but it has that wonderful mysterious and paradoxical quality that can only be achieved by mathematics. Uli, why don't you list one of your favorites?

Does anyone have any idea how the extra credit questions work? Can we turn them in at any time or are certain ones due by a specific date?

My personal favorite are Zeno's paradoxs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_paradox. Every one of them seems to be valid mathematically, but all of them defy common sense. The reason for this is that Zeno bases the the assumption that you cannot infinitely divide something. Eventually you get to the smallest unit of time or distance, and then you can't break it down anymore.

I dont have any theorems in mind but i always wanted to derive the general formula of a fibonnaci sequence based of basic math like not using the ideas of progression or any other general forms.If we could do it any way that is similar to Gauss.

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva