(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
'''[[MA 375 Spring 09 HW 5|Back]]'''
 
'''[[MA 375 Spring 09 HW 5|Back]]'''
  
Are straights allowed to "wrap around"? For example, QKA23--I remember when we did counting problems in class with cards, it was ok--[[jdrummon|jdrummon]]
+
Are straights allowed to "wrap around"? For example, QKA23--I remember when we did counting problems in class with cards, it was ok--[[User:jdrummon|jdrummon]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
No,  The low card for straights is Ace, as well as the high card. e.g.
 +
A2345 is the lowest straight
 +
10JQKA is the highest straight
 +
--[[User:Ajstrand|-Aaron]] 00:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
[[Category:MA375Spring2009Walther]]
 +
 
 +
==============================================
 +
 
 +
my idea was
 +
 
 +
|hands with distinct cards| - (|straights| + |flushes| - |straight flushes|)
 +
 
 +
but result is negative number. any idea?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
That's basically the right formula. Quick tip: you should be getting more around .5 for the probability when you are done.
 +
-mkburges
 +
 
 +
_______________________________________________
 +
 
 +
Alright, could someone please explain number 19, I partly understood it but not completely.  I have to say, these are interesting problems and I like the thought process they take.
 +
 
 +
Kristen P.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:MA375Spring2009Walther]]

Latest revision as of 16:05, 19 February 2009

Back

Are straights allowed to "wrap around"? For example, QKA23--I remember when we did counting problems in class with cards, it was ok--jdrummon


No, The low card for straights is Ace, as well as the high card. e.g. A2345 is the lowest straight 10JQKA is the highest straight ---Aaron 00:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

==================================

my idea was

|hands with distinct cards| - (|straights| + |flushes| - |straight flushes|)

but result is negative number. any idea?


That's basically the right formula. Quick tip: you should be getting more around .5 for the probability when you are done. -mkburges

_______________________________________________

Alright, could someone please explain number 19, I partly understood it but not completely. I have to say, these are interesting problems and I like the thought process they take.

Kristen P.

Alumni Liaison

ECE462 Survivor

Seraj Dosenbach