(Three crucial questions to answer)
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
<math>I = \sum_{j}P(\omega _j)\log_2P(\omega _j)</math>, when priors are known, else approximate <math>P(\omega _j)</math> by  
 
<math>I = \sum_{j}P(\omega _j)\log_2P(\omega _j)</math>, when priors are known, else approximate <math>P(\omega _j)</math> by  
<math>P(\omega _j) = \frac{\# of training patterns in \omega _j}{Total \# of training patterns}</math>
+
<math>P(\omega _j) = \frac{\#\,of\,training\,patterns\,in\,\omega_j}{Total\,\#\,of\,training\,patterns}</math>
  
 
* "Gini Impurity:"
 
* "Gini Impurity:"
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
defined as the "minimum probability that a training pattern is misclassified"
 
defined as the "minimum probability that a training pattern is misclassified"
 +
 +
Heuristically, want impurity to decrease from one node to its children.
 +
 +
[[Image:node_OldKiwi.jpg]]
 +
 +
We assume that several training patterns are available at node N and they have a good mix of all different classes.
 +
 +
I(N) := impurity at node N.
 +
 +
Define impurity drop at node N as:
 +
<math>\triangle I=I(N)-P_{L}I(N_{L})-(1-P_{L})I(N_{R})</math>
 +
 +
where <math>P_{L}</math> and <math>(1-P_{L})</math> are estimated with training patterns at node N.

Revision as of 09:27, 2 April 2008

When the number of categories, c is big, decision tress are particularly good.

Example: Consider the query "Identify the fruit" from a set of c=7 categories {watermelon, apple, grape, lemon, grapefruit, banana, cherry} .

One possible decision tree based on simple queries is the following:

Decision tree OldKiwi.jpg

    • To insert the decision tree example on fruits from class**

Three crucial questions to answer

For constructing a decision tree, for a given classification problem, we have to answer these three questions

1) Which question shoud be asked at a given node -"Query Selection"

2) When should we stop asking questions and declare the node to be a leaf -"When should we stop splitting"

3) Once a node is decided to be a leaf, what category should be assigned to this leaf -"Leaf classification"

We shall discuss questions 1 and 2 (3 being very trivial)

Need to define 'impurity' of a dataset such that $ impurity = 0 $ when all the training data belongs to one class.

Impurity is large when the training data contain equal percentages of each class

$ P(\omega _i) = \frac{1}{C} $; for all $ i $

Let $ I $ denote the impurity. Impurity can be defined in the following ways:

  • "Entropy Impurity":

$ I = \sum_{j}P(\omega _j)\log_2P(\omega _j) $, when priors are known, else approximate $ P(\omega _j) $ by $ P(\omega _j) = \frac{\#\,of\,training\,patterns\,in\,\omega_j}{Total\,\#\,of\,training\,patterns} $

  • "Gini Impurity:"

$ I = \sum_{i\ne j}P(\omega _i)P(\omega _j) = \frac{1}{2}[1- \sum_{j}P^2(\omega _j) $

Ex: when C = 2, $ I = P(\omega _1)P(\omega _2) $

  • "Misclassification Impurity:"

$ I = 1-max P(\omega _j) $

defined as the "minimum probability that a training pattern is misclassified"

Heuristically, want impurity to decrease from one node to its children.

Node OldKiwi.jpg

We assume that several training patterns are available at node N and they have a good mix of all different classes.

I(N) := impurity at node N.

Define impurity drop at node N as: $ \triangle I=I(N)-P_{L}I(N_{L})-(1-P_{L})I(N_{R}) $

where $ P_{L} $ and $ (1-P_{L}) $ are estimated with training patterns at node N.

Alumni Liaison

Have a piece of advice for Purdue students? Share it through Rhea!

Alumni Liaison