(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
I'm still stumped on 6 and 7.
 
I'm still stumped on 6 and 7.
  
 +
*For number six, assume that the line M is not a tangent, meaning it intersects the circle in more than one point. Call the points of intersection A and X. The theorem assumes that angle OAX is a right angle. But consider lengths OX and OA: they are both radii, and so they are equal. Viewing OAX as a triangle, what impossible circumstance does this last statement imply?
 +
 +
For 7 use THM 38 and the fact that there are 180 degrees in a line! This help?
  
 
[[ MA460 (Fall2009Walther) Homework|Back to MA460 (Fall2009Walther) Homework]]
 
[[ MA460 (Fall2009Walther) Homework|Back to MA460 (Fall2009Walther) Homework]]

Latest revision as of 18:32, 18 November 2009


HW 11

Does anyone have any hints for 6, 8, or 10?

for 10, draw out all of the little triangles separately. Start marking which sides equal which sides. you eventually get to triangle rpq equal to triangle spq so congruent angles.

I don't know those, but what about 3,7, and 9?

for 3, do law of sines 4 times (3 little triangles and big triangle) and simplyfy down.

for 9, use thm 17 3 times.

I'm still stumped on 6 and 7.

  • For number six, assume that the line M is not a tangent, meaning it intersects the circle in more than one point. Call the points of intersection A and X. The theorem assumes that angle OAX is a right angle. But consider lengths OX and OA: they are both radii, and so they are equal. Viewing OAX as a triangle, what impossible circumstance does this last statement imply?

For 7 use THM 38 and the fact that there are 180 degrees in a line! This help?

Back to MA460 (Fall2009Walther) Homework

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang