(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Homework 8 Collaboration Area ==
 
== Homework 8 Collaboration Area ==
  
Question on problem 15 in Sec 6.6.
+
Question on problem 15 in Sec 6.6:
  
 
I tried to obtain the expression for
 
I tried to obtain the expression for
Line 21: Line 21:
 
s/(s + 1)  *  1/(s+1)
 
s/(s + 1)  *  1/(s+1)
  
you'll need to compute the convolution integral:
+
via convolution, you'll need to compute the convolution integral:
  
 
<math>\int_0^t \cos(\tau)\sin(t-\tau)\ d\tau.</math>
 
<math>\int_0^t \cos(\tau)\sin(t-\tau)\ d\tau.</math>
  
 
You'll have to use a formula for the sine of the
 
You'll have to use a formula for the sine of the
difference of two angles and be very careful.
+
product of cosine and sine.  Here it is:
 +
 
 +
(cos A)(sin B) = (1/2)sin(A+B) + (1/2)sin(B-A).
 +
 
 +
You'll need to be very careful.
 
Remember,  t  acts like a constant in the integrals.
 
Remember,  t  acts like a constant in the integrals.
  
Line 33: Line 37:
 
of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)
 
of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)
  
* Another way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of
+
Another, and perhaps better, way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of
  
 
1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]]
 
1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]]
Line 45: Line 49:
 
to get the inverse transform.)   
 
to get the inverse transform.)   
  
P.257 #8: Based on the other problems from this section, I determine <math>f(t)=t^(n-1)e^(kt)</math> but I don't really see how this helps us. Any thoughts on how to get this problem going would be appreciated. Thanks!
+
P.257 #8: I'm a bit confused on how to get this problem started... Based on other problems in this section, we can factor out a t such that the function inside the transform is  t  times f(t) where f(t)=t^(n-1)e^(kt), but I don't see how that helps us much.
 +
 
 +
Answer from Bell:  You'll need to use mathematical induction for this problem. Start with n=1.  Then use the formula
 +
 
 +
L[ t f(t) ] = -F'(s)
 +
 
 +
to reduce the n=2 case to the n=1 case, etc.
 +
 
 +
(AJ) Also, there's a better table of Laplace transforms at the end of chapter 6 that has the transform for f(t) = t^(n-1)e^(kt)
 +
 
 +
Yes, but if you wanted to compute the transform the easy way instead of using the differentiation formula from the section, you would probably use
 +
 
 +
L[ f(t)e^{at} ] = F(s-a)
 +
 
 +
to get
 +
 
 +
L[ t^n e^{kt} ] = n!/ (s-k)^{n+1}
 +
 
 +
because
 +
 
 +
L[ t^n ] = n!/s^{n+1}.
 +
 
 +
(That's how they got that formula in the table in an earlier section.)
  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  

Latest revision as of 15:21, 19 October 2010

Homework 8 Collaboration Area

Question on problem 15 in Sec 6.6:

I tried to obtain the expression for

s/(s + 1) * 1/(s+1)

but am not getting the correct result in the Laplace table of

t sin t.

I am using the convolution of cos(tau)*sin(t-tau). There is no t term in sight. Is it okay to read off the table? Even if it is, shouldn't the result be the same?

Answer:

To find the inverse Laplace transform of

s/(s + 1) * 1/(s+1)

via convolution, you'll need to compute the convolution integral:

$ \int_0^t \cos(\tau)\sin(t-\tau)\ d\tau. $

You'll have to use a formula for the sine of the product of cosine and sine. Here it is:

(cos A)(sin B) = (1/2)sin(A+B) + (1/2)sin(B-A).

You'll need to be very careful. Remember, t acts like a constant in the integrals.

There is only one correct answer, so you should get it that way. (If it looks different than the back of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)

Another, and perhaps better, way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of

1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]]

...therefore greatly simplifying the solution (no trig identities required).

(You'll need to use the formula

L[ t f(t) ] = -F'(s)

to get the inverse transform.)

P.257 #8: I'm a bit confused on how to get this problem started... Based on other problems in this section, we can factor out a t such that the function inside the transform is t times f(t) where f(t)=t^(n-1)e^(kt), but I don't see how that helps us much.

Answer from Bell: You'll need to use mathematical induction for this problem. Start with n=1. Then use the formula

L[ t f(t) ] = -F'(s)

to reduce the n=2 case to the n=1 case, etc.

(AJ) Also, there's a better table of Laplace transforms at the end of chapter 6 that has the transform for f(t) = t^(n-1)e^(kt)

Yes, but if you wanted to compute the transform the easy way instead of using the differentiation formula from the section, you would probably use

L[ f(t)e^{at} ] = F(s-a)

to get

L[ t^n e^{kt} ] = n!/ (s-k)^{n+1}

because

L[ t^n ] = n!/s^{n+1}.

(That's how they got that formula in the table in an earlier section.)

Back to the MA 527 start page

To Rhea Course List

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva