Revision as of 11:40, 5 September 2013 by Jayling (Talk | contribs)


Homework 3 collaboration area


Question from James Down Under (Jayling):

For Page 329 Question 11. Am I meant to calculate all eigenvalues and eigenvectors or just calculate the eigenvector corresponding to the given eigenvalue of 3?

Answer from Steve Bell :

Yes, you are only supposed to find the eigenvector for lambda=3. (The idea here is to spare you from finding the roots of a rather nasty 3rd degree polynomial.)

Question from a student:

Let 3x+4y+2z = 0; 2x+5z= 0 be the system for which I have to find the basis.

When Row Reduced the above system gives [ 1 0 2.5 0 ; 0 1 -1.375 0].

Rank = no of non zero rows = 2 => Dim(rowspace) = 2 ; Nullity = # free variables = 1

Q1: Aren't [ 1 0 2.5] and [0 1 -1.375] called the basis of the system?

A1 from Steve Bell:

Those two vectors form a basis for the ROW SPACE.

The solution space is only 1 dimensional (since the number of free variables is only 1).

Q2: Why is that we get a basis by considering the free variable as some "parameter" and reducing further(and get 1 vector in this case). Isn't that the solution of the system?

A2 from Steve Bell :

If the system row reduces to

[ 1 0  2.5   0 ]
[ 0 1 -1.375 0 ]

then z is the free variable. Let it be t. The top equation gives

x = -2.5 t

and the second equation gives

y = 1.375 t

and of course,

z = t.

So the general solution is

[ x ]   [ -2.5   ]
[ y ] = [  1.375 ] t
[ z ]   [  1     ]

Thus, you can find the solution from the row echelon matrix, but I wouldn't say that you can read it off from there -- not without practice, at least.

Question from the Linear Algebra Noobee (Jayling) regarding the Lesson 7 material

An observation from me with eigenvalues and eigenvectors on the 2x2 matrices examples that you presented is that the column space of A-λI when you solve for the first eigenvalue corresponds to the column vector of the second eigenvalue? For the example on page 2 when you REF the A-λI the pivot yields the column space vector in the original matrix of [-2 1]T which exactly matches the eigenvector for when λ=-4, and similarly vice versa when λ=-1 and you REF the A-λI matrix it yields a column space vector of [1 1] T. Is this true for all matrix eigenvalue problems in general, I noticed that it is also true for the complex example that follows? Is this an obvious fact or just a coincidence? Your insight on this would be appreciated.


Back to MA527, Fall 2013









Back to MA527, Fall 2013

Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics