Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
From the above equation, it is obvious that <math>X_p(\omega)\!</math> is simply shifted copies of the original function (as can be seen by the <math>X(\omega - k\omega_s)\!</math>) that are divided by <math>T\!</math> (as can be seen by <math>\frac{1}{T}\!</math>).
 
From the above equation, it is obvious that <math>X_p(\omega)\!</math> is simply shifted copies of the original function (as can be seen by the <math>X(\omega - k\omega_s)\!</math>) that are divided by <math>T\!</math> (as can be seen by <math>\frac{1}{T}\!</math>).
 +
 +
=== How to recover <math>x(t)\!</math> ===
 +
In order to recover the original function, <math>x_p(t)\!</math>, we can simply low-pass filter <math>x_p(t)\!</math> as long as the filter, <math>H(\omega) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}T,& |\omega| < \omega_c\\ 0,&  else\\end{array}\right.\!</math>

Revision as of 13:12, 9 November 2008

Impulse-train Sampling

One type of sampling that satisfies the Sampling Theorem is called impulse-train sampling. This type of sampling is achieved by the use of a periodic impulse train multiplied by a continuous time signal, $ x(t)\! $. The periodic impulse train, $ p(t)\! $ is referred to as the sampling function, the period, $ T\! $, is referred to as the sampling period, and the fundamental frequency of $ p(t)\! $, $ \omega_s = \frac{2\pi}{T}\! $, is the sampling frequency. We define $ x_p(t)\! $ by the equation,

$ x_p(t) = x(t)p(t)\! $, where
$ p(t) = \sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty} \delta(t - nT)\! $

Graphically, this equation looks as follows,

             $ x(t)\! $ ----------> x --------> $ x_p(t)\! $
                              ^
                              |
                              |

a $ p(t) = \sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty} \delta(t - nT)\! $

By using linearity and the sifting property, $ x_p(t)\! $ can be represented as follows,

$ x_p(t) = x(t)p(t)\! $

     $        = x(t)\sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty} \delta(t - nT)\! $
     $        =\sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty}x(t)\delta(t - nT)\! $
     $        =\sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty}x(nT)\delta(t - nT)\! $

Now, in the time domain, $ x_p(t)\! $ looks like a group of shifted deltas with magnitude equal to the value of $ x(t)\! $ at that time, $ nT\! $, in the original function. In the frequency domain, $ X_p(\omega)\! $ looks like shifted copies of the original $ X(\omega)\! $ that repeat every $ \omega_s\! $, except that the magnitude of the copies is $ \frac{1}{T}\! $ of the magnitude of the original $ X(\omega)\! $.

Why does $ X_p(\omega)\! $ look like copies of the original $ X(\omega)\! $?

This answer can be found simply by using the Fourier Transform of the $ X_p(\omega)\! $.

$ X_p(\omega) = F(x(t)p(t))\! $

      $  = \frac{1}{2\pi}X(\omega) * P(\omega)\! $
      $  = \frac{1}{2\pi}X(\omega) * \sum^{\infty}_{k = -\infty}2\pi a_k \delta(\omega - \omega_s), a_k = \frac{1}{T}\! $
      $  = \sum^{\infty}_{k = -\infty}\frac{1}{T}X(\omega - k\omega_s)\! $

From the above equation, it is obvious that $ X_p(\omega)\! $ is simply shifted copies of the original function (as can be seen by the $ X(\omega - k\omega_s)\! $) that are divided by $ T\! $ (as can be seen by $ \frac{1}{T}\! $).

How to recover $ x(t)\! $

In order to recover the original function, $ x_p(t)\! $, we can simply low-pass filter $ x_p(t)\! $ as long as the filter, $ H(\omega) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}T,& |\omega| < \omega_c\\ 0,& else\\end{array}\right.\! $

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn