(New page: == Time Invariance == If the cascade x(t)--->[time delay by t0]----->[system]-----z(t) ---(1) yields the same output as the reverse of (a);x(t)--->[system]--->[time delay by t0]---y(t)...)
 
(Prove)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
x(t)--->[time delay by t0]--->y(t)=x(t-t0)----->[system]---->z(t)=2x(t-t0) ---(1)
 
x(t)--->[time delay by t0]--->y(t)=x(t-t0)----->[system]---->z(t)=2x(t-t0) ---(1)
  
x(t)--->[system]--->y(t)=2x(t)---->[time delay by y0]---->2x(t-t0) ---(2)
+
x(t)--->[system]--->y(t)=2x(t)---->[time delay by y0]---->z(t)=2x(t-t0) ---(2)
  
 
The results of (1) and (2) are the same. Thus, it is time invariant.
 
The results of (1) and (2) are the same. Thus, it is time invariant.

Latest revision as of 05:20, 12 September 2008

Time Invariance

If the cascade

x(t)--->[time delay by t0]----->[system]-----z(t) ---(1)

yields the same output as the reverse of (a);x(t)--->[system]--->[time delay by t0]---y(t), it is called Time invariant.


Prove

x(t)--->[system]-->y(t)=2x(t)


x(t)--->[time delay by t0]--->y(t)=x(t-t0)----->[system]---->z(t)=2x(t-t0) ---(1)

x(t)--->[system]--->y(t)=2x(t)---->[time delay by y0]---->z(t)=2x(t-t0) ---(2)

The results of (1) and (2) are the same. Thus, it is time invariant.

Alumni Liaison

To all math majors: "Mathematics is a wonderfully rich subject."

Dr. Paul Garrett