(Linearity and Time Invariance)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Homework 2_ECE301Fall2008mboutin]] - [[HW2-A Phil Cannon_ECE301Fall2008mboutin|'''A''']] - [[HW2-B Phil Cannon_ECE301Fall2008mboutin|'''B''']] - [[HW2-C Phil Cannon_ECE301Fall2008mboutin|'''C''']] - [[HW2-D Phil Cannon_ECE301Fall2008mboutin|'''D''']] - [[HW2-E Phil Cannon_ECE301Fall2008mboutin|'''E''']]
 +
 +
 
== Linearity and Time Invariance ==
 
== Linearity and Time Invariance ==
 
a).  This system cannot be time-invarient.  This can be proven by using the 3rd definition of Time Invariance given in class:
 
a).  This system cannot be time-invarient.  This can be proven by using the 3rd definition of Time Invariance given in class:

Latest revision as of 17:04, 11 September 2008

Homework 2_ECE301Fall2008mboutin - A - B - C - D - E


Linearity and Time Invariance

a). This system cannot be time-invarient. This can be proven by using the 3rd definition of Time Invariance given in class:

Hw2E ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg



b). Assuming the system were linear it would require an input $ X[n]=u[n]\! $ to yield $ Y[n]=u[n-1]\! $.

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood