(New page: Suppose that <math>f(x)</math> is continuously differentiable on the interval [a,b]. Let N be a positive integer and let <math> M = Max \{ |f'(x)| : a \leq x \leq b \} </math>. Let ...)
 
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Suppose that  <math>f(x)</math>  is continuously differentiable
 
Suppose that  <math>f(x)</math>  is continuously differentiable
on the interval  [a,b]. Let  N  be a positive integer
+
on the interval  [a,b].
and let <math> M = Max \{ |f'(x)| : a \leq x \leq b \} </math>.  Let
+
* Let  N  be a positive integer
<math> h = \frac{(b-a)}{N} </math> and let <math> R_N </math>  denote the "right endpoint"
+
* Let <math> M = Max \{ |f'(x)| : a \leq x \leq b \} </math>
 +
* Let <math> h = \frac{(b-a)}{N}</math>
 +
* Let <math> R_N </math>  denote the "right endpoint"
 +
 
 
Riemann Sum for the integral
 
Riemann Sum for the integral
 
  <math> I = \int_a^b f(x) dx .</math>
 
  <math> I = \int_a^b f(x) dx .</math>
Line 11: Line 14:
 
  <math> E \le \frac{M(b-a)^2}{N}. </math>
 
  <math> E \le \frac{M(b-a)^2}{N}. </math>
  
*So what does this equation "E < M(b-a)^2/N" mean.  This reads that the error is less than the Maximum value of the derivative of the function of x multiplied by the interval squared from x=a to x=b all divided by the total number of subintervals N.
+
(I moved all the discussion that used to be here to the discussion tab. I still think it would be nice to put a polished proof of the estimate here.  --[[User:Bell|Bell]] 14:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC))
 
+
*I don't understand why this must be true.  Maybe I'm wrong, but if f(x) were a horizontal line, wouldn't E=0 and M(b-a)^2/N also be =0.  That would mean it is a false statement that E < M(b-a)^2/N.  Are we to assume that E <= M(b-a)^2/N?
+
 
+
*Chumbert - Yeah, he said in class today (Wed.) to assume that, right?
+
*Bell - Oops!  Sorry about that.  You're right.  It needs to be <math>\le</math>.  (I can show that the ''only'' time it is actually equal is when the function <math>f(x)</math> is a constant function.)
+
*Ctuchek - I do remember him saying that we will need to use the Mean Value Theorem.
+
*Chumbert - Logically, I think I got it, but I'm not entirely sure how to prove it mathematically:
+
The <math>M(b-a)</math> gives the height of one section(slope=(y/x), so slope*x=y), where <math>\frac{(b-a)}{N}</math> gives the width, and when multiplied together, they give you a rectangle which, if you remember from class, is the error--take the R-sum, then stack the extra blocks on to of each other. Does anyone else remember that? Or should I explain it better?
+
 
+
*It's a bit easier to follow the discussion when one puts a signature after a comment. Just push the signature button in the edit page, or type two dashes followed by four ~, i.e. <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>, and your signature with the date will appear. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 17:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
+
 
+
*Dryg - I get what you're saying Chumbert.. Yeah I remember the explanation of the stacking of blocks of the error from each sum. Unfortunately, I don't know how to prove it mathematically either --[[User:Idryg|Idryg]] 14:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
+
 
+
*Somebody ought to be able to find the argument in their class notes.  I sketched the argument in class one day.  --[[User:Bell|Bell]] 12:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
+

Latest revision as of 10:49, 14 October 2008

Suppose that $ f(x) $ is continuously differentiable on the interval [a,b].

  • Let N be a positive integer
  • Let $ M = Max \{ |f'(x)| : a \leq x \leq b \} $
  • Let $ h = \frac{(b-a)}{N} $
  • Let $ R_N $ denote the "right endpoint"

Riemann Sum for the integral

$  I = \int_a^b f(x) dx . $

In other words,

$  R_N = \sum_{n=1}^N f(a + n h) h . $

Explain why the error, $ E = | R_N - I | $, satisfies

$  E \le \frac{M(b-a)^2}{N}.  $

(I moved all the discussion that used to be here to the discussion tab. I still think it would be nice to put a polished proof of the estimate here. --Bell 14:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC))

Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics