(Created page with "Category:ECE Category:QE Category:CE Category:problem solving Category:algorithms <center> <font size= 4> ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|ECE Ph.D. Qualifying...")
 
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's <math>Introduction\,to\,Algorithms</math>, section 34.5 for an example of this.
 
This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's <math>Introduction\,to\,Algorithms</math>, section 34.5 for an example of this.
  
[[ECE-QE_CE2-2015|Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015]]
+
[[ECE-QE_CE1-2015|Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015]]
  
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page]]
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page]]

Latest revision as of 21:43, 7 March 2016


ECE Ph.D. Qualifying Exam

Computer Engineering(CE)

Question 1: Algorithms

August 2015


Solution 1

This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's $ Introduction\,to\,Algorithms $, section 34.5 for an example of this.

Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015

Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page

Alumni Liaison

ECE462 Survivor

Seraj Dosenbach