(New page: I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values.
 
I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values.
 
--[[User:Jwromine|Jwromine]] 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Jwromine|Jwromine]] 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Since we did LPC in the lab without going over the details of solutions in class, I would prefer to learn the math behind the two methods before doing it in lab.

Revision as of 19:26, 26 April 2009

I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values. --Jwromine 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Since we did LPC in the lab without going over the details of solutions in class, I would prefer to learn the math behind the two methods before doing it in lab.

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood