Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
- You guys are life-savers.  I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys.
 
- You guys are life-savers.  I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys.
 +
--[[User:Klosekam|Klosekam]] 15:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Shouldn't the answer to number 56 be \frac{\pi}{2} - \ln{2} <\math> because you have to bring the 2 out before you take the integral meaning you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above by 2.

Revision as of 11:23, 8 October 2008

I'm going to give my even answers so far just to compare and see if everyone else is getting the same. Some are a little weird in my opinion. I used a calculator on a few too. -By the way, go here and make sure your preferences are set right so it makes these easier to read.

$ 38: \pi $

$ 48: x - \arctan{x} + c $

$ 50: ln(9) - 4 $

$ 56: \frac{\pi}{4} - \ln{2} $

$ 84 a) : -\cos(\theta)+\frac{1}{3}\cos^3(\theta)+c $

$ 84b) : -\cos(\theta)+\frac{2}{3}\cos^3(\theta)-\frac{1}{5}\cos^5(\theta)+c $

---Gary Brizendine II 14:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I have corrected the answer to numbers 50 and 56.

--John Mason 15:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

- You guys are life-savers. I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys. --Klosekam 15:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Shouldn't the answer to number 56 be \frac{\pi}{2} - \ln{2} <\math> because you have to bring the 2 out before you take the integral meaning you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above by 2.

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett