Revision as of 16:52, 1 April 2009 by Jcromer (Talk | contribs)

I got (1 - 2x) as the multiplicitave inverse, since that multiplied by (2x + 1) is 1. ... which i guess is the same as the original function. --Jcromer 20:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Recent Math PhD now doing a post-doctorate at UC Riverside.

Kuei-Nuan Lin