(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
= [[ECE-QE_CS5-2014|August 2014]], Problem 1 =
 
= [[ECE-QE_CS5-2014|August 2014]], Problem 1 =
  
:[[CS5_2014_Aug_prob1| Problem 1 ]],[[CS5_2014_Aug_prob2_solution| 2 ]]
+
:[[CS5_2014_Aug_prob1| Problem 1 ]],[[CS5_2014_Aug_prob2| 2 ]]
 
----
 
----
 
===Solution 1===
 
===Solution 1===
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
So <math>E[Y_x] = \lambda_x</math>
 
So <math>E[Y_x] = \lambda_x</math>
 +
 
<span style="color:red"> Here, it used <math>\sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 0} \frac{\lambda_x^k}{k!} = e^{\lambda_x}</math> to derive the final conclusion.</span>
 
<span style="color:red"> Here, it used <math>\sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 0} \frac{\lambda_x^k}{k!} = e^{\lambda_x}</math> to derive the final conclusion.</span>
  
Line 77: Line 78:
 
<math>
 
<math>
 
\int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{\lambda_T}{\lambda_0}\right)
 
\int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{\lambda_T}{\lambda_0}\right)
<\math>
+
</math>
  
 
e). Because from a). and c)., we can get  
 
e). Because from a). and c)., we can get  
Line 83: Line 84:
 
<math>
 
<math>
 
\int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{Y_T}{Y_0}\right)
 
\int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{Y_T}{Y_0}\right)
<\math>
+
</math>
 +
 
 +
<span style="color:red"> This photon attenuation question is very similar to other questions: for example 2017S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 3. Related topics are projection problems(e.g.: 2013S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 2; 2012S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 3) and scan problems(e.g.: 2016QE-CS5, Problem 1). </span>
 +
 
 +
 
 
----
 
----
 
[[ECE-QE_CS5-2014|Back to QE CS question 1, August 2014]]
 
[[ECE-QE_CS5-2014|Back to QE CS question 1, August 2014]]
  
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE QE page]]:
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE QE page]]:

Latest revision as of 16:42, 18 May 2017


ECE Ph.D. Qualifying Exam in Communication Networks Signal and Image processing (CS)

August 2014, Problem 1

Problem 1 , 2

Solution 1

a) $ E\left[Y_x\right] = \lambda_x $

Lack of proof. Should mention the property of Poisson distribution to show the equivalence. See the proof in solution 2.

b) Because the rate of absorption is proportional to the number of photons and the density of the material, so the attenuation of photons obeys the following equation

$ \frac{d\lambda_x}{dx} = -\mu(x)\lambda_x $

c) Solve the differential equation in b), we have

$ \lambda_x = \lambda_0e^{-\int^x_0\mu(t)dt} $

d) So the integral of the density, $ \int^T_0\mu(x)dx $ can be written as $ \int^T_0\mu(x)dx = -\log\left(\frac{\lambda_T}{\lambda_0}\right) $


e) $ \int^T_ \mu(x)dx \simeq -\log \left( \frac{Y_T}{Y_0} \right) $

Solution 2:

a). As we know $ P\left\{Y_x=k\right\} = \frac{e^{-\lambda_x}\lambda_x^k}{k!} $ is a Potion distribution, it is known that the expectation of a Poisson RV is $ \lambda_x $.

Proof:

$ \begin{split} E[Y_x] &= \sum^{+ \infty}_{k > 0} k \frac{e^{-\lambda_x}\lambda_x^k}{k!}\\ &= \sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 1} \frac{e^{-\lambda_x}\lambda_x^k}{(k-1)!}\\ &= \sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 1} \frac{e^{-\lambda_x}\lambda_x^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}\lambda_x\\ &= \lambda_xe^{-\lambda_x}\sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 0} \frac{\lambda_x^k}{k!}\\ &= \lambda_xe^{-\lambda_x}e^{\lambda_x}\\ &= \lambda_x\\ \end{split} $

So $ E[Y_x] = \lambda_x $

Here, it used $ \sum^{+ \infty}_{k = 0} \frac{\lambda_x^k}{k!} = e^{\lambda_x} $ to derive the final conclusion.

b). Because the number of photons will decrease when increasing the depth, $ d\lambda_x = -\lambda_x\mu(x)dx $

and

$ \frac{d\lambda_x}{dx} = -\lambda_x\mu(x) $

c). The final differential equation in b). is an ordinary differential equation. We can get the expression as

$ \lambda_x = \lambda_0e^{-\int^x_0\mu(t)dt} $

where $ \lambda_0 $ is the initial number of photons.

d). From part c). $ \frac{\lambda_x}{\lambda_0} = e^{-\int^x_0\mu(t)dt} $, so we have

$ \int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{\lambda_T}{\lambda_0}\right) $

e). Because from a). and c)., we can get

$ \int^x_0\mu(t)dt = -\log\left(\frac{Y_T}{Y_0}\right) $

This photon attenuation question is very similar to other questions: for example 2017S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 3. Related topics are projection problems(e.g.: 2013S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 2; 2012S-ECE637-Exam1, Problem 3) and scan problems(e.g.: 2016QE-CS5, Problem 1).



Back to QE CS question 1, August 2014

Back to ECE QE page:

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn