(New page: So this question asks for which valus of n are Kn, Cn, Wn and Qn bipartite. ---->>> are we supposed to consider n=0 or are these graphs only defined for n>0?--Tsnowdon 18...)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
---->>> are we supposed to consider n=0 or are these graphs only defined for n>0?--[[User:Tsnowdon|Tsnowdon]] 18:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 
---->>> are we supposed to consider n=0 or are these graphs only defined for n>0?--[[User:Tsnowdon|Tsnowdon]] 18:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 
--- n>0, otherwise the graph would have no vertices. [[User:rtabchou|rtabchou]]
 
--- n>0, otherwise the graph would have no vertices. [[User:rtabchou|rtabchou]]
 +
------------
 +
Are we supposed to consider n=1 for K1 as bipartite, or do we need at least 2 vertices for a bipartite graph?

Revision as of 17:04, 5 November 2008

So this question asks for which valus of n are Kn, Cn, Wn and Qn bipartite.


>>> are we supposed to consider n=0 or are these graphs only defined for n>0?--Tsnowdon 18:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

--- n>0, otherwise the graph would have no vertices. rtabchou


Are we supposed to consider n=1 for K1 as bipartite, or do we need at least 2 vertices for a bipartite graph?

Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics