(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I am confused as well, anyone have any diection? -ERaymond 10/16/08 10:20am
 
I am confused as well, anyone have any diection? -ERaymond 10/16/08 10:20am
 +
 +
 +
The recurrence relation is an equation relating <math>a_n</math> to previous values of <math>a_n</math> i.e. <math>a_{n-1}</math>. For example, a recurrence relation would be <math>a_n</math> = <math>a_{n-1}</math> + 2.
 +
 +
In part b), you are asked for an explicit formula. This is an equation from which we can compute <math>a_n</math> directly. i.e. <math>a_n</math> = 27n.
 +
However, in general, I dont think it is always possible to obtain an explicit forumla.
 +
 +
Note: you will need some initial conditions to derive the explicit formula.
 +
 +
I hope this helps,
 +
 +
Tom --[[User:Tsnowdon|Tsnowdon]] 15:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
This is the say way I did it and I believe that it is right.
 +
--[[User:Podarcze|Podarcze]] 18:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:34, 19 October 2008

I'm a bit confused by the phrasing of this problem. Is the recurrence relation just the $ a_n $ statement without the initial conditions?

I am confused as well, anyone have any diection? -ERaymond 10/16/08 10:20am


The recurrence relation is an equation relating $ a_n $ to previous values of $ a_n $ i.e. $ a_{n-1} $. For example, a recurrence relation would be $ a_n $ = $ a_{n-1} $ + 2.

In part b), you are asked for an explicit formula. This is an equation from which we can compute $ a_n $ directly. i.e. $ a_n $ = 27n. However, in general, I dont think it is always possible to obtain an explicit forumla.

Note: you will need some initial conditions to derive the explicit formula.

I hope this helps,

Tom --Tsnowdon 15:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)



This is the say way I did it and I believe that it is right. --Podarcze 18:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

has a message for current ECE438 students.

Sean Hu, ECE PhD 2009