m (User:Aifrank moved to 4.1 Homework: wrong name)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.
 
Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.
 +
 +
Here is an idea: P(n)="given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set".
 +
 +
Then assume P(n) and prove P(n+1) by
 +
a) checking what happens when at most one of 2n+1 and 2n+2 are chosen,
 +
b) what happens if both are chosen.
 +
 +
b) is harder, investigate what happens if n+1 was chosen.
 +
 +
if n+1 was not chosen, pretend you also get to chose k+1 and go from there.

Revision as of 10:32, 2 September 2008

Does anyone know how to go about starting problem 50 for 4.1

Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.

Here is an idea: P(n)="given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set".

Then assume P(n) and prove P(n+1) by a) checking what happens when at most one of 2n+1 and 2n+2 are chosen, b) what happens if both are chosen.

b) is harder, investigate what happens if n+1 was chosen.

if n+1 was not chosen, pretend you also get to chose k+1 and go from there.

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood