Create the page "Integral" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
- Fu(U) = P[U<= u) = integral from -inf to +inf of 1 du = u120 B (29 words) - 16:51, 20 October 2008
- *i.e. the first integral will look something like this: <math> f_z(z)= \int \limits_{0}^{\infty} \la2 KB (344 words) - 17:00, 21 October 2008
- Another integral to convolute is <math> f_z(z)= \int \limits_{z}^{\infty} \lambda e^{-\lambd196 B (37 words) - 18:58, 21 October 2008
- *E[1/x] = integral(<math>\lambda e^{-\lambda x}</math> * (1/x)) dx * this integral is undefined182 B (28 words) - 14:48, 10 November 2008
- I would suggest splitting the double integral up. (Think of a double integral as a nested for loop -- integrating "slowly" over the outside loop and "qui1 KB (167 words) - 18:33, 9 December 2008
- E[x-q(x))^2] = Integral from -inf to inf (x-q(x))^2*fx(x)dx =integral from 0 to 1 (x-q(x))^2dx253 B (48 words) - 08:44, 10 December 2008
- Riemann Sum for the integral719 B (133 words) - 10:49, 14 October 2008
- Evaluate the Integral:1 KB (259 words) - 08:19, 1 October 2008
- Evaluate the integral: Good work. That last integral is easier to look at if you write <math>e^{-x}</math> in place of <math>\fr1 KB (260 words) - 07:50, 3 October 2008
- ...a <math> \frac{t}{p} </math> so I would have a ''dt''. That led me to the integral below. Does it make sense and does anyone know how to integrate the proble I don't know how to use this integral, but I did some manipulation and got this:1 KB (270 words) - 09:43, 7 October 2008
- A(t) = the integral of e^(-x) dx from 0 to t V(t) = the integral of Pi*[e^(-x)]^2 dx from 0 to t1 KB (245 words) - 18:31, 6 October 2008
- ...with the limits of integration when you take the derivative of a definite integral?645 B (120 words) - 18:05, 6 October 2008
- ...pi/2 instead of pi/4 because you have to bring out a 2 before you take the integral meaning that you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above b Now in the first integral substitute <math>v=2x</math> Therefore <math>dv=2dx</math> and when x=0, v=2 KB (315 words) - 14:23, 8 October 2008
- <math>\int\frac{6*2du}{1+u^2}</math> an easily-integrated integral. :) [[User:Jhunsber|Jhunsber]]794 B (147 words) - 14:30, 8 October 2008
- ...heir powers are equal), you can use this trick to drastically simplify the integral. It's a case that I don't think we covered in reading or lecture, but it d3 KB (584 words) - 10:12, 21 October 2008
- ...it eventually, but the inverse sin just gets worse and worse. Actually the integral of the inverse sin is just the inverse sin minus some radical. So it just c This looks better... but then I can't figure out how to solve that integral. Anyone? I've tried using the bottom as dv and going back to the inverse si2 KB (289 words) - 12:27, 14 October 2008
- ...es to <math>-\frac{3}{2}</math>, And I use partial fractions on the second integral: I solve for the first integral, leaving:1 KB (224 words) - 08:12, 14 October 2008
- Again we want to estimate the error for this integral on the interval x is between 0 and 13 KB (599 words) - 08:47, 13 November 2008
- That works wonder if the first part of the integral is x to the third power, but in this case, you end up with an uneliminatabl858 B (146 words) - 11:37, 1 November 2008
- ...ide of the equation the closer we get to <math>\frac{\pi}{4}</math>. This integral can therefore be called the error function.10 KB (1,816 words) - 15:32, 8 December 2008
- ...te integral converge for anyone? Also, if you are having trouble with the integral, take a look at the derivatives of inverse hyperbolic functions. --[[User:3 KB (531 words) - 09:53, 28 October 2008
- ...x = 7 or 8, and then decreases as x goes to infinity. In order to use the Integral test, however, doesn't the function have to be continually decreasing over I got that this one diverged by Integral Test after I ended up using the integral...Mathematica said the same. Anyone agree that it diverges? I just want t1 KB (190 words) - 12:16, 3 November 2008
- ...amental theorem of calculus, because it allows one to compute the definite integral of a function by using any one of its infinitely many anti derivatives. Thi343 B (52 words) - 17:32, 14 September 2008
- ''computation of the integral is the same as shown in the section above''650 B (86 words) - 06:49, 3 September 2008
- Since we already know that the integral equals <math> 2\pi </math>, dividing that by <math> 4\pi </math> will yield897 B (142 words) - 10:00, 4 September 2008
- The solution to this integral is 1/4.329 B (60 words) - 14:39, 4 September 2008
- ...alogue linear electronics a capacitor is represented mathematically by the integral <math> y(t) = 1/C\int_{-\infty}^t x(\tau) d\tau </math> which is also a sys1 KB (182 words) - 19:20, 18 September 2008
- we can determine the output using convolution integral1 KB (215 words) - 14:56, 26 September 2008
- ...Fourier transform X(w) and compute its inverse Fourier transform using the integral formula. (Make it difficult).123 B (19 words) - 11:20, 3 October 2008
- Specify a signal x(t) and compute its Fourier transform using the integral formula.( Make a hard one)913 B (139 words) - 12:24, 16 September 2013
- Compute the Fourier transform of the following CT signal using the integral formula:2 KB (279 words) - 12:25, 16 September 2013
- Compute the inverse Fourier transform of the following signal using the integral formula:2 KB (384 words) - 12:42, 16 September 2013
- Specify a signal x(t) and compute its Fourier transform using the integral formula. (Make sure your signal is not trivial to transform; it should be h By the integral formula:2 KB (263 words) - 12:30, 16 September 2013
- ...Fourier transform X(w) and compute its inverse Fourier transform using the integral formula. (Make sure your signal is not trivial to transform; it should be h By the integral formula:2 KB (379 words) - 12:47, 16 September 2013
- ...pposed to compute. The setup is typically straightforward -- put it in an integral (except in a few hard-to-calculate cases) as per the formula, change the si667 B (107 words) - 18:49, 7 October 2008
- So very similar to part a we can take the integral and use the sifting property of the delta function Paying special attention to the first integral, the resulting exponential is negative because the delta function is time r8 KB (1,324 words) - 18:59, 8 October 2008
- ==Transform by integral==1 KB (177 words) - 12:35, 16 September 2013
- ...DT signal to the frequency domain with a summation and back again with an integral. Is information conserved here?426 B (77 words) - 14:22, 8 October 2008
- I don't know how to evaluate this integral, I'm not sure if it can be. Any thoughts? The integral as it stands cannot be evaluated. This is one of those problems where you3 KB (449 words) - 17:07, 8 October 2008
- ...er transforms are pretty straight forward when you set up them up with the integral and simplifying/combining terms, but actually computing them can be difficu563 B (100 words) - 14:43, 8 October 2008
- .../math> does not depend on "<math> \tau </math>" it can be taken out of the integral.1 KB (256 words) - 09:42, 23 October 2008
- ...the F.T. of x(t) has deltas in it. Do you know how to get deltas out of an integral? Spending 10 seconds thinking about the problem can save you 10 minutes dow3 KB (665 words) - 19:39, 23 October 2008
- We can now see that if if <math>2+a\leq 0</math>, the integral diverges844 B (158 words) - 08:41, 17 November 2008
- .../math> does not depend on "<math> \tau </math>" it can be taken out of the integral.927 B (170 words) - 09:59, 17 November 2008
- If 2+a<=0 then integral diverges635 B (128 words) - 18:14, 17 November 2008
- If <math>a+b\leq 0</math>, then the integral Diverges4 KB (499 words) - 11:29, 16 September 2013
- if <math> q+a \geq 0, </math> integral diverges1 KB (198 words) - 09:15, 23 November 2008
- ...can conclude that if <math>2 + a</math> is greater or equal to 0 then the integral diverges. Else:728 B (154 words) - 14:35, 23 November 2008
- if <math>b+a\leq 0\!</math> or <math>Re(s) \leq -b\!</math>, then the integral diverges.3 KB (553 words) - 17:12, 24 November 2008
- The inverse Laplace transform is given by the following complex integral ...ses if its Laplace transform can be taken, other than to say the defining integral converges. It is however easy to give theorems on cases where it may or may3 KB (438 words) - 16:26, 24 November 2008