Revision as of 15:58, 28 January 2009 by Mkorb (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'm a little confused about cycle notation. I'm trying to find the permutation described by an example in the book. It says that a permutation (13)(27)(456)(8)(1237)(648)(5) can be expressed in disjoint cycle form as (1732)(48)(56). I believe the resulting permutation should be found as follows:
[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]
Locations 5 and 6 swap. Locations 4 and 8 swap. Location 1 becomes 7, 7 becomes 3, 3 becomes 2, 2 becomes 1.
So the resulting permutation is [7 1 2 8 6 5 3 4].
However, when I try to compute this using the original redundant form, I get something different:
[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]
(648): Location 4 goes to location 6. 8 to 4. 6 to 8.
[1 2 3 8 5 4 7 6]
(1237): 2 to 1. 3 to 2. 7 to 3. 1 to 7.
[2 3 7 8 5 4 1 6]
(456): 5 to 4. 6 to 5. 4 to 6.
[2 3 7 5 4 8 1 6]
(27): Swap locations 2 and 7.
[2 1 7 5 4 8 3 7]
(13): Swap locations 1 and 3.
[7 1 2 5 4 8 3 6]
This time I get a different permutation. It would appear I'm doing this all wrong. Can anyone help?

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett