Revision as of 19:24, 24 September 2008 by Dfreidin (Talk)

Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost.


I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about how $ \phi_{a^{n}}=1 $, but I thought that we basically needed to show that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=1 $.

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang